# Citations and Trust in LLM Generated Responses

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.01303 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.01303/

## Key facts

- Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Jan 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.03426/) (2018)
- [Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11511/) (2023)
- [Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.07269/) (2017)
- [Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00399/) (2017)
- [The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lying](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13734/) (2023)
- [Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07697/) (2019)
- [Explainability for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.01029/) (2023)
- [Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.02114/) (2020)
- [Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.07810/) (2018)
- [Demystifying Prompts in Language Models via Perplexity Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04037/) (2022)
- [Automated Rationale Generation: A Technique for Explainable AI and its Effects on Human Perceptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.03729/) (2019)
- [Reliable, Adaptable, and Attributable Language Models with Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03187/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Conformal Linguistic Calibration: Trading-off between Factuality and Specificity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19110/) (2025)
- [Epistemic Alignment: A Mediating Framework for User-LLM Knowledge Delivery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.01205/) (2025)
- [SSRL: Self-Search Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10874/) (2025)
- [A Call for Collaborative Intelligence: Why Human-Agent Systems Should Precede AI Autonomy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09420/) (2025)
- [Source Coverage and Citation Bias in LLM-based vs. Traditional Search Engines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.09483/) (2025)
- [FACTUM: Mechanistic Detection of Citation Hallucination in Long-Form RAG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.05866/) (2026)
- [Transparentize the Internal and External Knowledge Utilization in LLMs with Trustworthy Citation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14856/) (2025)
- [Reallocating Attention Across Layers to Reduce Multimodal Hallucination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.10285/) (2025)
- [Towards a Multimodal Document-grounded Conversational AI System for Education](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13884/) (2025)
- [When AI Persuades: Adversarial Explanation Attacks on Human Trust in AI-Assisted Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.04003/) (2026)
- [Insider Knowledge: How Much Can RAG Systems Gain from Evaluation Secrets?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.13227/) (2026)
- [Aligning Large Language Model Behavior with Human Citation Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.05205/) (2026)
- [SourceBench: Can AI Answers Reference Quality Web Sources?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.16942/) (2026)
- [Quantifying Uncertainty in AI Visibility: A Statistical Framework for Generative Search Measurement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.08924/) (2026)
- [Verified Misguidance: Measuring Structural Citation Failures in Search-Augmented LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.28565/) (2026)
- [VetScore: Risk-Weighted Fact Verification for Veterinary Long-Form QA with Citations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.03675/) (2026)
- [Data Citation for Large Language Models: A Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.25663/) (2026)
- [WildSEEK: Evaluating Language Models for Information-Seeking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.30683/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Question answering systems are rapidly advancing, but their opaque nature may impact user trust. We explored trust through an anti-monitoring framework, where trust is predicted to be correlated with presence of citations and inversely related to checking citations. We tested this hypothesis with a live question-answering experiment that presented text responses generated using a commercial Chatbot along with varying citations (zero, one, or five), both relevant and random, and recorded if participants checked the citations and their self-reported trust in the generated responses. We found a significant increase in trust when citations were present, a result that held true even when the citations were random; we also found a significant decrease in trust when participants checked the citations. These results highlight the importance of citations in enhancing trust in AI-generated content.
