# Uncertainty quantification for improving radiomic-based models in radiation pneumonitis prediction

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19511 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.19511/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 48 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 Dec 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [Concrete Problems in AI Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.06565/) (2016)
- [Measuring Calibration in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.01685/) (2019)
- [Conformal Prediction: a Unified Review of Theory and New Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.07972/) (2020)
- [Image biomarker standardisation initiative](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.07003/) (2016)
- [Trustworthy clinical AI solutions: a unified review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning models for medical image analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03736/) (2022)
- [Don't Just Blame Over-parametrization for Over-confidence: Theoretical Analysis of Calibration in Binary Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.07856/) (2021)
- [Assessing robustness of radiomic features by image perturbation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.06719/) (2018)
- [Towards reliable head and neck cancers locoregional recurrence prediction using delta-radiomics and learning with rejection option](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.14452/) (2022)
- [A Baseline for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Examples in Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05418/) (2022)
- [Conformal Predictors for Compound Activity Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.04506/) (2016)
- [Precision Radiotherapy via Information Integration of Expert Human Knowledge and AI Recommendation to Optimize Clinical Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.04565/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Background: Radiation pneumonitis is a side effect of thoracic radiation therapy. Recently, machine learning models with radiomic features have improved radiation pneumonitis prediction by capturing spatial information. To further support clinical decision-making, this study explores the role of post hoc uncertainty quantification methods in enhancing model uncertainty estimate. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 101 esophageal cancer patients. This study evaluated four machine learning models: logistic regression, support vector machines, extreme gradient boosting, and random forest, using 15 dosimetric, 79 dosiomic, and 237 radiomic features to predict radiation pneumonitis. We applied uncertainty quantification methods, including Platt scaling, isotonic regression, Venn-ABERS predictor, and conformal prediction, to quantify uncertainty. Model performance was assessed through an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), and adaptive calibration error using leave-one-out cross-validation. Results: Highest AUROC is achieved by the logistic regression model with the conformal prediction method (AUROC 0.75+-0.01, AUPRC 0.74+-0.01) at a certainty cut point of 0.8. Highest AUPRC of 0.82+-0.02 (with AUROC of 0.67+-0.04) achieved by The extreme gradient boosting model with conformal prediction at the 0.9 certainty threshold. Radiomic and dosiomic features improve both discriminative and calibration performance. Conclusions: Integrating uncertainty quantification into machine learning models with radiomic and dosiomic features may improve both predictive accuracy and calibration, supporting more reliable clinical decision-making. The findings emphasize the value of uncertainty quantification methods in enhancing applicability of predictive models for radiation pneumonitis in healthcare settings.
