# Leveraging Sentiment for Offensive Text Classification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.17825 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.17825/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 5 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.03654/) (2020)
- [SemEval-2019 Task 6: Identifying and Categorizing Offensive Language in Social Media (OffensEval)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.08983/) (2019)
- [Searching for Activation Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.05941/) (2017)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [RedditESS: A Mental Health Social Support Interaction Dataset -- Understanding Effective Social Support to Refine AI-Driven Support Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.21888/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we conduct experiment to analyze whether models can classify offensive texts better with the help of sentiment. We conduct this experiment on the SemEval 2019 task 6, OLID, dataset. First, we utilize pre-trained language models to predict the sentiment of each instance. Later we pick the model that achieved the best performance on the OLID test set, and train it on the augmented OLID set to analyze the performance. Results show that utilizing sentiment increases the overall performance of the model.