# Style Transfer Dataset: What Makes A Good Stylization?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.17139 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.17139/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 15 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10196/) (2017)
- [StyTr2: Image Style Transfer with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.14576/) (2021)
- [AdaAttN: Revisit Attention Mechanism in Arbitrary Neural Style Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.03647/) (2021)
- [ArtFlow: Unbiased Image Style Transfer via Reversible Neural Flows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.16877/) (2021)
- [Combining Markov Random Fields and Convolutional Neural Networks for Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1601.04589/) (2016)
- [Controlling Perceptual Factors in Neural Style Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.07865/) (2016)
- [Fast Patch-based Style Transfer of Arbitrary Style](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.04337/) (2016)
- [Quality Evaluation of Arbitrary Style Transfer: Subjective Study and Objective Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.00623/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [SOYO: A Tuning-Free Approach for Video Style Morphing via Style-Adaptive Interpolation in Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06998/) (2025)
- [Deciphering Personalization: Towards Fine-Grained Explainability in Natural Language for Personalized Image Generation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.01932/) (2025)
- [LouvreSAE: Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretable and Controllable Style Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.18930/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We present a new dataset with the goal of advancing image style transfer - the task of rendering one image in the style of another image. The dataset covers various content and style images of different size and contains 10.000 stylizations manually rated by three annotators in 1-10 scale. Based on obtained ratings, we find which factors are mostly responsible for favourable and poor user evaluations and show quantitative measures having statistically significant impact on user grades. A methodology for creating style transfer datasets is discussed. Presented dataset can be used in automating multiple tasks, related to style transfer configuration and evaluation.