# A Reality Check on Context Utilisation for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.17031 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.17031/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation.
- Builds on 47 of its 68 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2024.

## Placed in

- Retrieval-augmented generation / [RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/rag/rag-robustness-and-adaptive-retrieval/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 47)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05262/) (2022)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10997/) (2023)
- [Language Models as Knowledge Bases?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01066/) (2019)
- [Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01373/) (2023)
- [FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05355/) (2018)
- [Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00093/) (2023)
- [Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14974/) (2020)
- [Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14767/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Automated Fact-Checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.11896/) (2021)
- [Making Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Robust to Irrelevant Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01558/) (2023)
- [Entity-Based Knowledge Conflicts in Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05052/) (2021)
- [Adaptive Chameleon or Stubborn Sloth: Revealing the Behavior of Large Language Models in Knowledge Conflicts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13300/) (2023)
- [FreshLLMs: Refreshing Large Language Models with Search Engine Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03214/) (2023)
- [Knowledge Conflicts for LLMs: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08319/) (2024)
- [RealTime QA: What's the Answer Right Now?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.13332/) (2022)
- [Get Your Vitamin C! Robust Fact Verification with Contrastive Evidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.08541/) (2021)
- [Demystifying Prompts in Language Models via Perplexity Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04037/) (2022)
- [HoVer: A Dataset for Many-Hop Fact Extraction And Claim Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.03088/) (2020)
- [CLIMATE-FEVER: A Dataset for Verification of Real-World Climate Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.00614/) (2020)
- [Causal Inference in Natural Language Processing: Estimation, Prediction, Interpretation and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00725/) (2021)
- [MultiFC: A Real-World Multi-Domain Dataset for Evidence-Based Fact Checking of Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03242/) (2019)
- [AVeriTeC: A Dataset for Real-world Claim Verification with Evidence from the Web](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13117/) (2023)
- [Towards Debiasing Fact Verification Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.05267/) (2019)
- [Retrieval Augmented Generation or Long-Context LLMs? A Comprehensive Study and Hybrid Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.16833/) (2024)
- [Cutting Off the Head Ends the Conflict: A Mechanism for Interpreting and Mitigating Knowledge Conflicts in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.18154/) (2024)
- [Factcheck-Bench: Fine-Grained Evaluation Benchmark for Automatic Fact-checkers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09000/) (2023)
- [What Evidence Do Language Models Find Convincing?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11782/) (2024)
- [A Richly Annotated Corpus for Different Tasks in Automated Fact-Checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.01214/) (2019)
- [Generating Literal and Implied Subquestions to Fact-check Complex Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.06938/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Conflicting Evidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13079/) (2025)
- [CoCoLex: Confidence-guided Copy-based Decoding for Grounded Legal Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05534/) (2025)
- [UniKnow: A Unified Framework for Reliable Language Model Behavior across Parametric and External Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13648/) (2025)
- [Multi-Step Knowledge Interaction Analysis via Rank-2 Subspace Disentanglement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.01706/) (2025)
- [How Context Shapes Truth: Geometric Transformations of Statement-level Truth Representations in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.06599/) (2026)
- [Understanding the Interplay between LLMs' Utilisation of Parametric and Contextual Knowledge: A keynote at ECIR 2025](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.09654/) (2026)
- [Document-Authored Control-Signal Impersonation: A Low-Cost Indirect Prompt Attack on RAG Safety Boundaries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.09005/) (2026)
- [Listening Between the Lines: Decoding Podcast Narratives with Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.05310/) (2025)
- [ContextClaim: A Context-Driven Paradigm for Verifiable Claim Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.30025/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) helps address the limitations of parametric knowledge embedded within a language model (LM). In real world settings, retrieved information can vary in complexity, yet most investigations of LM utilisation of context has been limited to synthetic text. We introduce DRUID (Dataset of Retrieved Unreliable, Insufficient and Difficult-to-understand contexts) with real-world queries and contexts manually annotated for stance. The dataset is based on the prototypical task of automated claim verification, for which automated retrieval of real-world evidence is crucial. We compare DRUID to synthetic datasets (CounterFact, ConflictQA) and find that artificial datasets often fail to represent the complexity and diversity of realistically retrieved context. We show that synthetic datasets exaggerate context characteristics rare in real retrieved data, which leads to inflated context utilisation results, as measured by our novel ACU score. Moreover, while previous work has mainly focused on singleton context characteristics to explain context utilisation, correlations between singleton context properties and ACU on DRUID are surprisingly small compared to other properties related to context source. Overall, our work underscores the need for real-world aligned context utilisation studies to represent and improve performance in real-world RAG settings.