# Face the Facts! Evaluating RAG-based Pipelines for Professional Fact-Checking

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.15189 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15189/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 28 of its 57 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14314/) (2023)
- [Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.09118/) (2021)
- [BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11520/) (2021)
- [Defending Against Neural Fake News](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12616/) (2019)
- [Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09203/) (2019)
- [SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09525/) (2021)
- [A Survey on Automated Fact-Checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.11896/) (2021)
- [A Deep Reinforced Model for Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.04304/) (2017)
- [Explainable Automated Fact-Checking for Public Health Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.09926/) (2020)
- [A Survey of Evaluation Metrics Used for NLG Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.12009/) (2020)
- [Generating Fact Checking Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05773/) (2020)
- [How to Train Your DRAGON: Diverse Augmentation Towards Generalizable Dense Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07452/) (2023)
- [GCAN: Graph-aware Co-Attention Networks for Explainable Fake News Detection on Social Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.11648/) (2020)
- [End-to-End Multimodal Fact-Checking and Explanation Generation: A Challenging Dataset and Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12487/) (2022)
- [DeClarE: Debunking Fake News and False Claims using Evidence-Aware Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.06416/) (2018)
- [The science of fake news](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.07903/) (2023)
- [Answers Unite! Unsupervised Metrics for Reinforced Summarization Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01610/) (2019)
- [Explainable Automated Fact-Checking: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.03870/) (2020)
- [Enhancing Conversational Search: Large Language Model-Aided Informative Query Rewriting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.09716/) (2023)
- [Generating Counter Narratives against Online Hate Speech: Data and Strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04216/) (2020)
- [Reinforcement Learning-based Counter-Misinformation Response Generation: A Case Study of COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.06433/) (2023)
- [XFake: Explainable Fake News Detector with Visualizations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.07757/) (2019)
- [JustiLM: Few-shot Justification Generation for Explainable Fact-Checking of Real-world Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.08026/) (2024)
- [Benchmarking the Generation of Fact Checking Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.15202/) (2023)
- [Explainable Fact Checking with Probabilistic Answer Set Programming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.09198/) (2019)
- [DTCA: Decision Tree-based Co-Attention Networks for Explainable Claim Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.13455/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [ClaimIQ at CheckThat! 2025: Comparing Prompted and Fine-Tuned Language Models for Verifying Numerical Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.11492/) (2025)
- [Assisted Counterspeech Writing at the Crossroads of Hate Speech and Misinformation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.22435/) (2026)
- [TAIGR: Towards Modeling Influencer Content on Social Media via Structured, Pragmatic Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.20032/) (2026)
- [CAAFC: Chronological Actionable Automated Fact-Checker for misinformation / non-factual hallucination detection and correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12436/) (2026)
- [CATCH-ME if you RAG: a dataset of Contextually Annotated multi-Turn Counterspeech against Hate and Misinformation Exchanges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.20369/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Natural Language Processing and Generation systems have recently shown the potential to complement and streamline the costly and time-consuming job of professional fact-checkers. In this work, we lift several constraints of current state-of-the-art pipelines for automated fact-checking based on the Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) paradigm. Our goal is to benchmark, following professional fact-checking practices, RAG-based methods for the generation of verdicts - i.e., short texts discussing the veracity of a claim - evaluating them on stylistically complex claims and heterogeneous, yet reliable, knowledge bases. Our findings show a complex landscape, where, for example, LLM-based retrievers outperform other retrieval techniques, though they still struggle with heterogeneous knowledge bases; larger models excel in verdict faithfulness, while smaller models provide better context adherence, with human evaluations favouring zero-shot and one-shot approaches for informativeness, and fine-tuned models for emotional alignment.
