# An Extension-Based Argument-Ranking Semantics: Social Rankings in Abstract Argumentation Long Version

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13632 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.13632/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 2 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [A Comparative Study of Ranking-based Semantics for Abstract Argumentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.01059/) (2016)
- [Ranking-based Argumentation Semantics Applied to Logical Argumentation (full version)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16780/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [GRASP: Deterministic argument ranking in interaction graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.19141/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we introduce a new family of argument-ranking semantics which can be seen as a refinement of the classification of arguments into skeptically accepted, credulously accepted and rejected. To this end we use so-called social ranking functions which have been developed recently to rank individuals based on their performance in groups. We provide necessary and sufficient conditions for a social ranking function to give rise to an argument-ranking semantics satisfying the desired refinement property.