# Impact of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning Model Explainability

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.11119 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11119/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 20 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Segment Anything](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02643/) (2023)
- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.00298/) (2021)
- [Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragile](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10547/) (2017)
- [Mitigating Adversarial Effects Through Randomization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.01991/) (2017)
- [Adversarial Examples: Attacks and Defenses for Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.07107/) (2017)
- [Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blame](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.07983/) (2019)
- [Synthetic Benchmarks for Scientific Research in Explainable Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.12543/) (2021)
- [Robust Attribution Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.09957/) (2019)
- [Proper Network Interpretability Helps Adversarial Robustness in Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.14748/) (2020)
- [Robust Explanation Constraints for Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08507/) (2022)
- [A simple defense against adversarial attacks on heatmap explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.06381/) (2020)
- [How to Manipulate CNNs to Make Them Lie: the GradCAM Case](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.10901/) (2019)
- [Attention Meets Post-hoc Interpretability: A Mathematical Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03485/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we investigate the impact of adversarial attacks on the explainability of deep learning models, which are commonly criticized for their black-box nature despite their capacity for autonomous feature extraction. This black-box nature can affect the perceived trustworthiness of these models. To address this, explainability techniques such as GradCAM, SmoothGrad, and LIME have been developed to clarify model decision-making processes. Our research focuses on the robustness of these explanations when models are subjected to adversarial attacks, specifically those involving subtle image perturbations that are imperceptible to humans but can significantly mislead models. For this, we utilize attack methods like the Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) and the Basic Iterative Method (BIM) and observe their effects on model accuracy and explanations. The results reveal a substantial decline in model accuracy, with accuracies dropping from 89.94% to 58.73% and 45.50% under FGSM and BIM attacks, respectively. Despite these declines in accuracy, the explanation of the models measured by metrics such as Intersection over Union (IoU) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) shows negligible changes, suggesting that these metrics may not be sensitive enough to detect the presence of adversarial perturbations.
