# Physics Instrument Design with Reinforcement Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.10237 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.10237/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RL for energy, networks and operations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 8 of its 23 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2024.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [RL for energy, networks and operations](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/rl-for-energy-networks-and-operations/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6114/) (2013)
- [Distributed Prioritized Experience Replay](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.00933/) (2018)
- [CaloGAN: Simulating 3D High Energy Particle Showers in Multi-Layer Electromagnetic Calorimeters with Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.10321/) (2017)
- [Learning representations of irregular particle-detector geometry with distance-weighted graph networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.07987/) (2019)
- [CaloClouds: Fast Geometry-Independent Highly-Granular Calorimeter Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04847/) (2023)
- [Object condensation: one-stage grid-free multi-object reconstruction in physics detectors, graph and image data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.03605/) (2020)
- [CaloClouds II: Ultra-Fast Geometry-Independent Highly-Granular Calorimeter Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.05704/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [End-to-End Optimal Detector Design with Mutual Information Surrogates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14342/) (2025)
- [Large Language Models for Physics Instrument Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.07580/) (2026)
- [NeutronGym: Physics-Graded Neutron Instrument Design for LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.03631/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We present a case for the use of Reinforcement Learning (RL) for the design of physics instrument as an alternative to gradient-based instrument-optimization methods. It's applicability is demonstrated using two empirical studies. One is longitudinal segmentation of calorimeters and the second is both transverse segmentation as well longitudinal placement of trackers in a spectrometer. Based on these experiments, we propose an alternative approach that offers unique advantages over differentiable programming and surrogate-based differentiable design optimization methods. First, Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms possess inherent exploratory capabilities, which help mitigate the risk of convergence to local optima. Second, this approach eliminates the necessity of constraining the design to a predefined detector model with fixed parameters. Instead, it allows for the flexible placement of a variable number of detector components and facilitates discrete decision-making. We then discuss the road map of how this idea can be extended into designing very complex instruments. The presented study sets the stage for a novel framework in physics instrument design, offering a scalable and efficient framework that can be pivotal for future projects such as the Future Circular Collider (FCC), where most optimized detectors are essential for exploring physics at unprecedented energy scales.