# Analyzing Fairness of Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.09900 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.09900/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- [Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02413/) (2016)
- [A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09635/) (2019)
- [Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10045/) (2019)
- [Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.06520/) (2016)
- [Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.07524/) (2016)
- [Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.07593/) (2018)
- [Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.05144/) (2017)
- [AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.01943/) (2018)
- [A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.04422/) (2018)
- [FairGAN: Fairness-aware Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.11202/) (2018)
- [Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.03586/) (2017)
- [The age of secrecy and unfairness in recidivism prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00731/) (2018)
- [The Unfairness of Fair Machine Learning: Levelling down and strict egalitarianism by default](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.02404/) (2023)
- [Toward Fairness in AI for People with Disabilities: A Research Roadmap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.02227/) (2019)
- [Efficient candidate screening under multiple tests and implications for fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11361/) (2019)
- [Fairness in Algorithmic Recourse Through the Lens of Substantive Equality of Opportunity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.16088/) (2024)
- [On the (In)Compatibility between Group Fairness and Individual Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.07174/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML) algorithms play a critical role in decision-making across various domains, such as healthcare, finance, education, and law enforcement. However, concerns about fairness and bias in these systems have raised significant ethical and social challenges. To address these challenges, this research utilizes two prominent fairness libraries, Fairlearn by Microsoft and AIF360 by IBM. These libraries offer comprehensive frameworks for fairness analysis, providing tools to evaluate fairness metrics, visualize results, and implement bias mitigation algorithms. The study focuses on assessing and mitigating biases for unstructured datasets using Computer Vision (CV) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) models. The primary objective is to present a comparative analysis of the performance of mitigation algorithms from the two fairness libraries. This analysis involves applying the algorithms individually, one at a time, in one of the stages of the ML lifecycle, pre-processing, in-processing, or post-processing, as well as sequentially across more than one stage. The results reveal that some sequential applications improve the performance of mitigation algorithms by effectively reducing bias while maintaining the model's performance. Publicly available datasets from Kaggle were chosen for this research, providing a practical context for evaluating fairness in real-world machine learning workflows.