# Benchmarking Table Comprehension In The Wild

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.09884 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.09884/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 19 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.17557/) (2024)
- [FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00122/) (2021)
- [TAT-QA: A Question Answering Benchmark on a Hybrid of Tabular and Textual Content in Finance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.07624/) (2021)
- [InternLM2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.17297/) (2024)
- [FinanceBench: A New Benchmark for Financial Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.11944/) (2023)
- [ToTTo: A Controlled Table-To-Text Generation Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14373/) (2020)
- [FeTaQA: Free-form Table Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.00369/) (2021)
- [Global Table Extractor (GTE): A Framework for Joint Table Identification and Cell Structure Recognition Using Visual Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00589/) (2020)
- [Leave No Document Behind: Benchmarking Long-Context LLMs with Extended Multi-Doc QA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.17419/) (2024)
- [TableLLM: Enabling Tabular Data Manipulation by LLMs in Real Office Usage Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.19318/) (2024)
- [Open-WikiTable: Dataset for Open Domain Question Answering with Complex Reasoning over Table](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07288/) (2023)
- [FinanceMath: Knowledge-Intensive Math Reasoning in Finance Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09797/) (2023)
- [Tables as Texts or Images: Evaluating the Table Reasoning Ability of LLMs and MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12424/) (2024)
- [MultiTabQA: Generating Tabular Answers for Multi-Table Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12820/) (2023)
- [Mixed-modality Representation Learning and Pre-training for Joint Table-and-Text Retrieval in OpenQA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.05197/) (2022)
- [Multi-modal Retrieval of Tables and Texts Using Tri-encoder Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.04049/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs), while being increasingly dominant on a myriad of knowledge-intensive activities, have only had limited success understanding lengthy table-text mixtures, such as academic papers and financial reports. Recent advances of long-context LLMs have opened up new possibilities for this field. Nonetheless, we identify two roadblocks: (1) Prior benchmarks of table question answering (TableQA) have focused on isolated tables without context, making it hard to evaluate models in real-world scenarios. (2) Prior benchmarks have focused on some narrow skill sets of table comprehension such as table recognition, data manipulation/calculation, table summarization etc., while a skilled human employs those skills collectively. In this work, we introduce TableQuest, a new benchmark designed to evaluate the holistic table comprehension capabilities of LLMs in the natural table-rich context of financial reports. We employ a rigorous data processing and filtering procedure to ensure that the question-answer pairs are logical, reasonable, and diverse. We experiment with 7 state-of-the-art models, and find that despite reasonable accuracy in locating facts, they often falter when required to execute more sophisticated reasoning or multi-step calculations. We conclude with a qualitative study of the failure modes and discuss the challenges of constructing a challenging benchmark. We make the evaluation data, judging procedure and results of this study publicly available to facilitate research in this field.