# Asking Again and Again: Exploring LLM Robustness to Repeated Questions

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.07923 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.07923/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05250/) (2016)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03172/) (2023)
- [When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10511/) (2022)
- [Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.07328/) (2017)
- [Large Language Models Struggle to Learn Long-Tail Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.08411/) (2022)
- [Entity-Based Knowledge Conflicts in Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05052/) (2021)
- [Rich Knowledge Sources Bring Complex Knowledge Conflicts: Recalibrating Models to Reflect Conflicting Evidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.13701/) (2022)
- [DisentQA: Disentangling Parametric and Contextual Knowledge with Counterfactual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.05655/) (2022)
- [Collective Critics for Creative Story Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02428/) (2024)
- [TASA: Deceiving Question Answering Models by Twin Answer Sentences Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.15221/) (2022)
- [Adaptive Question Answering: Enhancing Language Model Proficiency for Addressing Knowledge Conflicts with Source Citations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04241/) (2024)
- [EchoPrompt: Instructing the Model to Rephrase Queries for Improved In-context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.10687/) (2023)
- [MoPS: Modular Story Premise Synthesis for Open-Ended Automatic Story Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05690/) (2024)
- [It Is Not About What You Say, It Is About How You Say It: A Surprisingly Simple Approach for Improving Reading Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16779/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Prompt Repetition Improves Non-Reasoning LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.14982/) (2025)
- [Large Language Models Are Overconfident in Their Own Responses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.03437/) (2026)
- [Mitigating Label Length Bias in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.14385/) (2025)
- [UpSkill: Mutual Information Skill Learning for Structured Response Diversity in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.22296/) (2026)
- [Mitigating Hallucinations in Zero-Shot Scientific Summarisation: A Pilot Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.00931/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This study investigates whether repeating questions within prompts influences the performance of large language models (LLMs). We hypothesize that reiterating a question within a single prompt might enhance the model's focus on key elements of the query. We evaluate five recent LLMs -- including GPT-4o-mini, DeepSeek-V3, and smaller open-source models -- on three reading comprehension datasets under different prompt settings, varying question repetition levels (1, 3, or 5 times per prompt). Our results demonstrate that question repetition can increase models' accuracy by up to 6%. However, across all models, settings, and datasets, we do not find the result statistically significant. These findings provide insights into prompt design and LLM behavior, suggesting that repetition alone does not significantly impact output quality.
