# LLM-guided Task and Motion Planning using Knowledge-based Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.07493 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.07493/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 17 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Spatial and embodied reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/spatial-and-embodied-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.01691/) (2022)
- [Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.07207/) (2022)
- [FoundationPose: Unified 6D Pose Estimation and Tracking of Novel Objects](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.08344/) (2023)
- [ChatGPT for Robotics: Design Principles and Model Abilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17582/) (2023)
- [PDDLStream: Integrating Symbolic Planners and Blackbox Samplers via Optimistic Adaptive Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08705/) (2018)
- [Task and Motion Planning with Large Language Models for Object Rearrangement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.06247/) (2023)
- [AutoTAMP: Autoregressive Task and Motion Planning with LLMs as Translators and Checkers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.06531/) (2023)
- [LLM3:Large Language Model-based Task and Motion Planning with Motion Failure Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.11552/) (2024)
- [Task Planning in Robotics: an Empirical Comparison of PDDL-based and ASP-based Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.08229/) (2018)
- [RobotGPT: Robot Manipulation Learning from ChatGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.01421/) (2023)
- [Interactive Task Planning with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10645/) (2023)
- [Integrating Action Knowledge and LLMs for Task Planning and Situation Handling in Open Worlds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17590/) (2023)
- [Sampling-Based Motion Planning: A Comparative Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13119/) (2023)
- [Sequence-Based Plan Feasibility Prediction for Efficient Task and Motion Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.01576/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Position: Towards a Responsible LLM-empowered Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01714/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Performing complex manipulation tasks in dynamic environments requires efficient Task and Motion Planning (TAMP) approaches that combine high-level symbolic plans with low-level motion control. Advances in Large Language Models (LLMs), such as GPT-4, are transforming task planning by offering natural language as an intuitive and flexible way to describe tasks, generate symbolic plans, and reason. However, the effectiveness of LLM-based TAMP approaches is limited due to static and template-based prompting, which limits adaptability to dynamic environments and complex task contexts. To address these limitations, this work proposes a novel Onto-LLM-TAMP framework that employs knowledge-based reasoning to refine and expand user prompts with task-contextual reasoning and knowledge-based environment state descriptions. Integrating domain-specific knowledge into the prompt ensures semantically accurate and context-aware task plans. The proposed framework demonstrates its effectiveness by resolving semantic errors in symbolic plan generation, such as maintaining logical temporal goal ordering in scenarios involving hierarchical object placement. The proposed framework is validated through both simulation and real-world scenarios, demonstrating significant improvements over the baseline approach in terms of adaptability to dynamic environments and the generation of semantically correct task plans.