# MoE-CAP: Benchmarking Cost, Accuracy and Performance of Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.07067 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.07067/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Efficient MoE training and inference systems, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts.
- Builds on 9 of its 53 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2024.

## Placed in

- Mixture-of-experts / [Efficient MoE training and inference systems](https://mlsanity.com/moe/efficient-moe-training-and-inference-systems/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Qwen Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16609/) (2023)
- [EfficientQAT: Efficient Quantization-Aware Training for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.11062/) (2024)
- [SeerAttention: Learning Intrinsic Sparse Attention in Your LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13276/) (2024)
- [BitDistiller: Unleashing the Potential of Sub-4-Bit LLMs via Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10631/) (2024)
- [MoE-Lightning: High-Throughput MoE Inference on Memory-constrained GPUs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.11217/) (2024)
- [MARLIN: Mixed-Precision Auto-Regressive Parallel Inference on Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.11743/) (2024)
- [SkyServe: Serving AI Models across Regions and Clouds with Spot Instances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.01438/) (2024)
- [The Hallucinations Leaderboard -- An Open Effort to Measure Hallucinations in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05904/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture is increasingly favored for scaling Large Language Models (LLMs) efficiently, but it depends on heterogeneous compute and memory resources. These factors jointly affect system Cost, Accuracy, and Performance (CAP), making trade-offs inevitable. Existing benchmarks often fail to capture these trade-offs accurately, complicating practical deployment decisions. To address this, we introduce MoE-CAP, a benchmark specifically designed for MoE systems. Our analysis reveals that achieving an optimal balance across CAP is difficult with current hardware; MoE systems typically optimize two of the three dimensions at the expense of the third-a dynamic we term the MoE-CAP trade-off. To visualize this, we propose the CAP Radar Diagram. We further introduce sparsity-aware performance metrics-Sparse Memory Bandwidth Utilization (S-MBU) and Sparse Model FLOPS Utilization (S-MFU)-to enable accurate performance benchmarking of MoE systems across diverse hardware platforms and deployment scenarios.