# 3D-Consistent Image Inpainting with Diffusion Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.05881 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05881/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in 3D, point cloud and scene generation, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 10 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2024.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [3D, point cloud and scene generation](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/3d-point-cloud-and-scene-generation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.05233/) (2021)
- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.03585/) (2015)
- [Inpaint Anything: Segment Anything Meets Image Inpainting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06790/) (2023)
- [Diffusion Model-Based Image Editing: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17525/) (2024)
- [Conditional Image Generation with Score-Based Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.13606/) (2021)
- [On the Importance of Noise Scheduling for Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.10972/) (2023)
- [Improved Noise Schedule for Diffusion Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.03297/) (2024)
- [A General Protocol to Probe Large Vision Models for 3D Physical Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06836/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We address the problem of 3D inconsistency of image inpainting based on diffusion models. We propose a generative model using image pairs that belong to the same scene. To achieve the 3D-consistent and semantically coherent inpainting, we modify the generative diffusion model by incorporating an alternative point of view of the scene into the denoising process. This creates an inductive bias that allows to recover 3D priors while training to denoise in 2D, without explicit 3D supervision. Training unconditional diffusion models with additional images as in-context guidance allows to harmonize the masked and non-masked regions while repainting and ensures the 3D consistency. We evaluate our method on one synthetic and three real-world datasets and show that it generates semantically coherent and 3D-consistent inpaintings and outperforms the state-of-art methods.
