# Artificial intelligence and the internal processes of creativity

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04366 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04366/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 4 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity but reduces the diversity of novel content](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.00506/) (2023)
- [Homogenization Effects of Large Language Models on Human Creative Ideation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01536/) (2024)
- [The feasibility of artificial consciousness through the lens of neuroscience](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00915/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Generative AI and Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17241/) (2025)
- [Are Semantic Networks Associated with Idea Originality in Artificial Creativity? A Comparison with Human Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02048/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems capable of generating creative outputs are reshaping our understanding of creativity. This shift presents an opportunity for creativity researchers to reevaluate the key components of the creative process. In particular, the advanced capabilities of AI underscore the importance of studying the internal processes of creativity. This paper explores the neurobiological machinery that underlies these internal processes and describes the experiential component of creativity. It is concluded that although the products of artificial and human creativity can be similar, the internal processes are different. The paper also discusses how AI may negatively affect the internal processes of human creativity, such as the development of skills, the integration of knowledge, and the diversity of ideas.