# Can LLMs plan paths in the real world?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.17912 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.17912/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 15 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Factuality Challenges in the Era of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05189/) (2023)
- [Taming Overconfidence in LLMs: Reward Calibration in RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.09724/) (2024)
- [Towards LLM-based Fact Verification on News Claims with a Hierarchical Step-by-Step Prompting Method](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00305/) (2023)
- [On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models (A Critical Investigation with a Proposed Benchmark)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06706/) (2023)
- [Can Large Language Models Reason and Plan?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04121/) (2024)
- [VELMA: Verbalization Embodiment of LLM Agents for Vision and Language Navigation in Street View](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06082/) (2023)
- ["I'm Not Sure, But...": Examining the Impact of Large Language Models' Uncertainty Expression on User Reliance and Trust](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.00623/) (2024)
- [LLM-A*: Large Language Model Enhanced Incremental Heuristic Search on Path Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.02511/) (2024)
- [The Larger the Better? Improved LLM Code-Generation via Budget Reallocation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.00725/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Constraint-Aware Route Recommendation from Natural Language via Hierarchical LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.06078/) (2025)
- [AlphaSpace: Enabling Robotic Actions through Semantic Tokenization and Symbolic Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18769/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As large language models (LLMs) increasingly integrate into vehicle navigation systems, understanding their path-planning capability is crucial. We tested three LLMs through six real-world path-planning scenarios in various settings and with various difficulties. Our experiments showed that all LLMs made numerous errors in all scenarios, revealing that they are unreliable path planners. We suggest that future work focus on implementing mechanisms for reality checks, enhancing model transparency, and developing smaller models.
