# Enhancing Character-Level Understanding in LLMs through Token Internal Structure Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.17679 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.17679/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 28 of its 47 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Units](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1508.07909/) (2015)
- [Qwen2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10671/) (2024)
- [LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13372/) (2024)
- [ByT5: Towards a token-free future with pre-trained byte-to-byte models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.13626/) (2021)
- [TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.05002/) (2020)
- [The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.12288/) (2023)
- [CANINE: Pre-training an Efficient Tokenization-Free Encoder for Language Representation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.06874/) (2021)
- [Neural Machine Translation with Byte-Level Subwords](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03341/) (2019)
- [EXAMS: A Multi-Subject High School Examinations Dataset for Cross-Lingual and Multilingual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.03080/) (2020)
- [KOBEST: Korean Balanced Evaluation of Significant Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.04541/) (2022)
- [What do tokens know about their characters and how do they know it?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.02608/) (2022)
- [Models In a Spelling Bee: Language Models Implicitly Learn the Character Composition of Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.11193/) (2021)
- [Large Language Models Lack Understanding of Character Composition of Words](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.11357/) (2024)
- [Improving Chinese Spelling Check by Character Pronunciation Prediction: The Effects of Adaptivity and Granularity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.10996/) (2022)
- [Rethinking Masked Language Modeling for Chinese Spelling Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17721/) (2023)
- [Chinese Spelling Correction as Rephrasing Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08796/) (2023)
- [Disentangled Phonetic Representation for Chinese Spelling Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14783/) (2023)
- [CSCD-NS: a Chinese Spelling Check Dataset for Native Speakers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.08788/) (2022)
- [C-LLM: Learn to Check Chinese Spelling Errors Character by Character](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16536/) (2024)
- [Learn Your Tokens: Word-Pooled Tokenization for Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11628/) (2023)
- [A Comprehensive Evaluation and Analysis Study for Chinese Spelling Check](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13655/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Spelling-out is not Straightforward: LLMs' Capability of Tokenization from Token to Characters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.10641/) (2025)
- [RAIR: Retrieval-Augmented Iterative Refinement for Chinese Spelling Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.18938/) (2025)
- [NOLLI: A Difficulty-Calibrated Puzzle Benchmark for Diagnosing the English-Korean Performance Gap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.04397/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Tokenization methods like Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) enhance computational efficiency in large language models (LLMs) but often obscure internal character structures within tokens. This limitation hinders LLMs' ability to predict precise character positions, which is crucial in tasks like Chinese Spelling Correction (CSC) where identifying the positions of misspelled characters accelerates correction processes. We propose Token Internal Position Awareness (TIPA), a method that significantly improves models' ability to capture character positions within tokens by training them on reverse character prediction tasks using the tokenizer's vocabulary. Experiments demonstrate that TIPA enhances position prediction accuracy in LLMs, enabling more precise identification of target characters in original text. Furthermore, when applied to downstream tasks that do not require exact position prediction, TIPA still boosts performance in tasks needing character-level information, validating its versatility and effectiveness.
