# Preference Optimization for Reasoning with Pseudo Feedback

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.16345 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16345/

## Key facts

- Cited by 39 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 30 of its 72 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Mathematical reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/mathematical-reasoning/)
- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Process reward models for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/process-reward-models-for-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 30)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12950/) (2023)
- [Qwen2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10671/) (2024)
- [Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12186/) (2024)
- [Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.12588/) (2022)
- [Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.14275/) (2022)
- [MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.12284/) (2023)
- [Self-Rewarding Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10020/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models Can Self-Improve](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11610/) (2022)
- [WizardMath: Empowering Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models via Reinforced Evol-Instruct](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09583/) (2023)
- [Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01335/) (2024)
- [MAmmoTH: Building Math Generalist Models through Hybrid Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.05653/) (2023)
- [The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forget](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17493/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models are Better Reasoners with Self-Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09561/) (2022)
- [Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MAD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01850/) (2023)
- [Making Large Language Models Better Reasoners with Step-Aware Verifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.02336/) (2022)
- [Measuring Progress on Scalable Oversight for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.03540/) (2022)
- [Orca-Math: Unlocking the potential of SLMs in Grade School Math](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14830/) (2024)
- [MathScale: Scaling Instruction Tuning for Mathematical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02884/) (2024)
- [Solving Math Word Problems by Combining Language Models With Symbolic Solvers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.09102/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Self-Evolution of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14387/) (2024)
- [Prover-Verifier Games improve legibility of LLM outputs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.13692/) (2024)
- [Learning Planning-based Reasoning by Trajectories Collection and Process Reward Synthesizing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00658/) (2024)
- [Weak-to-Strong Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.13647/) (2024)
- [SAIL: Self-Improving Efficient Online Alignment of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15567/) (2024)
- [Enabling Language Models to Implicitly Learn Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00898/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 39)

- [Visual-RFT: Visual Reinforcement Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01785/) (2025)
- [Right Question is Already Half the Answer: Fully Unsupervised LLM Reasoning Incentivization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05812/) (2025)
- [KodCode: A Diverse, Challenging, and Verifiable Synthetic Dataset for Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.02951/) (2025)
- [S*: Test Time Scaling for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14382/) (2025)
- [ACECODER: Acing Coder RL via Automated Test-Case Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01718/) (2025)
- [Unified Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reward Model through Reinforcement Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.03318/) (2025)
- [UniVG-R1: Reasoning Guided Universal Visual Grounding with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14231/) (2025)
- [ReMA: Learning to Meta-think for LLMs with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09501/) (2025)
- [VLN-R1: Vision-Language Navigation via Reinforcement Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.17221/) (2025)
- [SeRL: Self-Play Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models with Limited Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20347/) (2025)
- [Scaling Laws of Synthetic Data for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19551/) (2025)
- [JarvisArt: Liberating Human Artistic Creativity via an Intelligent Photo Retouching Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.17612/) (2025)
- [RL of Thoughts: Navigating LLM Reasoning with Inference-time Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14140/) (2025)
- [GRE Suite: Geo-localization Inference via Fine-Tuned Vision-Language Models and Enhanced Reasoning Chains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18700/) (2025)
- [Token-Importance Guided Direct Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19653/) (2025)
- [AdsQA: Towards Advertisement Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.08621/) (2025)
- [Surrogate Signals from Format and Length: Reinforcement Learning for Solving Mathematical Problems without Ground Truth Answers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19439/) (2025)
- [Unsupervised Elicitation of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.10139/) (2025)
- [Can LLMs Generate High-Quality Test Cases for Algorithm Problems? TestCase-Eval: A Systematic Evaluation of Fault Coverage and Exposure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12278/) (2025)
- [Uncovering the Impact of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Direct Preference Optimization: Lessons from Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11656/) (2025)
- [GEMeX-RMCoT: An Enhanced Med-VQA Dataset for Region-Aware Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.17939/) (2025)
- [Semantic Voting: A Self-Evaluation-Free Approach for Efficient LLM Self-Improvement on Unverifiable Open-ended Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.23067/) (2025)
- [Wisdom of the Crowd: Reinforcement Learning from Coevolutionary Collective Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.12338/) (2025)
- [Balancing the Budget: Understanding Trade-offs Between Supervised and Preference-Based Finetuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11284/) (2025)
- [How Many Code and Test Cases Are Enough? Evaluating Test Cases Generation from a Binary-Matrix Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.08720/) (2025)
- [QueST: Incentivizing LLMs to Generate Difficult Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.17715/) (2025)
- [SAFENLIDB: A Privacy-Preserving Safety Alignment Framework for LLM-based Natural Language Database Interfaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.06778/) (2025)
- [StructTest: Benchmarking LLMs' Reasoning through Compositional Structured Outputs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.18011/) (2024)
- [CyCLeGen: Cycle-Consistent Layout Prediction and Image Generation in Vision Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.14957/) (2026)
- [CoAct: Co-Active LLM Preference Learning with Human-AI Synergy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.17501/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Preference optimization techniques, such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), are frequently employed to enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in domains like mathematical reasoning and coding, typically following supervised fine-tuning. These methods rely on high-quality labels for reasoning tasks to generate preference pairs; however, the availability of reasoning datasets with human-verified labels is limited. In this study, we introduce a novel approach to generate pseudo feedback for reasoning tasks by framing the labeling of solutions to reason problems as an evaluation against associated test cases. We explore two forms of pseudo feedback based on test cases: one generated by frontier LLMs and the other by extending self-consistency to multi-test-case. We conduct experiments on both mathematical reasoning and coding tasks using pseudo feedback for preference optimization, and observe improvements across both tasks. Specifically, using Mathstral-7B as our base model, we improve MATH results from 58.3 to 68.6, surpassing both NuminaMath-72B and GPT-4-Turbo-1106-preview. In GSM8K and College Math, our scores increase from 85.6 to 90.3 and from 34.3 to 42.3, respectively. Building on Deepseek-coder-7B-v1.5, we achieve a score of 24.6 on LiveCodeBench (from 21.1), surpassing Claude-3-Haiku.
