# RE-Bench: Evaluating frontier AI R&D capabilities of language model agents against human experts

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15114 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15114/

## Key facts

- Cited by 175 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 32 of its 59 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Web, search, and research agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/web-search-and-research-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12022/) (2023)
- [WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13854/) (2023)
- [GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12983/) (2023)
- [The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.06292/) (2024)
- [OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.16741/) (2024)
- [ChemCrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05376/) (2023)
- [Eureka: Human-Level Reward Design via Coding Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12931/) (2023)
- [Textbooks Are All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.11644/) (2023)
- [MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07095/) (2024)
- [MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03302/) (2023)
- [SciCode: A Research Coding Benchmark Curated by Scientists](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.13168/) (2024)
- [Nemotron-4 340B Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11704/) (2024)
- [EvoPrompting: Language Models for Code-Level Neural Architecture Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.14838/) (2023)
- [DS-Agent: Automated Data Science by Empowering Large Language Models with Case-Based Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17453/) (2024)
- [DISCOVERYWORLD: A Virtual Environment for Developing and Evaluating Automated Scientific Discovery Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06769/) (2024)
- [Chip Placement with Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.10746/) (2020)
- [Scientific Large Language Models: A Survey on Biological & Chemical Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.14656/) (2024)
- [OMNI-EPIC: Open-endedness via Models of human Notions of Interestingness with Environments Programmed in Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15568/) (2024)
- [SciAgent: Tool-augmented Language Models for Scientific Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11451/) (2024)
- [MLR-Copilot: Autonomous Machine Learning Research based on Large Language Models Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.14033/) (2024)
- [CYBERSECEVAL 3: Advancing the Evaluation of Cybersecurity Risks and Capabilities in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.01605/) (2024)
- [SUPER: Evaluating Agents on Setting Up and Executing Tasks from Research Repositories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.07440/) (2024)
- [Sabotage Evaluations for Frontier Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21514/) (2024)
- [Discovering Preference Optimization Algorithms with and for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08414/) (2024)
- [AutoML in the Age of Large Language Models: Current Challenges, Future Opportunities and Risks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08107/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 175)

- [Humanity's Last Exam](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.14249/) (2025)
- [PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.01848/) (2025)
- [Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Scheming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04984/) (2024)
- [AIDE: AI-Driven Exploration in the Space of Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13138/) (2025)
- [KernelBench: Can LLMs Write Efficient GPU Kernels?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.10517/) (2025)
- [Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.08679/) (2025)
- [Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Software Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14499/) (2025)
- [Deep Research Agents: A Systematic Examination And Roadmap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.18096/) (2025)
- [MLGym: A New Framework and Benchmark for Advancing AI Research Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14499/) (2025)
- [Establishing Best Practices for Building Rigorous Agentic Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.02825/) (2025)
- [Measuring the Impact of Early-2025 AI on Experienced Open-Source Developer Productivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.09089/) (2025)
- [From Automation to Autonomy: A Survey on Large Language Models in Scientific Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13259/) (2025)
- [BixBench: a Comprehensive Benchmark for LLM-based Agents in Computational Biology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.00096/) (2025)
- [AI Research Agents for Machine Learning: Search, Exploration, and Generalization in MLE-bench](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.02554/) (2025)
- [MLR-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents on Open-Ended Machine Learning Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19955/) (2025)
- [PostTrainBench: Can LLM Agents Automate LLM Post-Training?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.08640/) (2026)
- [Fully Autonomous AI Agents Should Not be Developed](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.02649/) (2025)
- [Ctrl-Z: Controlling AI Agents via Resampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10374/) (2025)
- [Infrastructure for AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.10114/) (2025)
- [A sketch of an AI control safety case](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.17315/) (2025)
- [AIRS-Bench: a Suite of Tasks for Frontier AI Research Science Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06855/) (2026)
- [From Language to Action: A Review of Large Language Models as Autonomous Agents and Tool Users](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.17281/) (2025)
- [Long-Horizon-Terminal-Bench: Testing the Limits of Agents on Long-Horizon Terminal Tasks with Dense Reward-Based Grading](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.08964/) (2026)
- [CO-Bench: Benchmarking Language Model Agents in Algorithm Search for Combinatorial Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.04310/) (2025)
- [MLRC-Bench: Can Language Agents Solve Machine Learning Research Challenges?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.09702/) (2025)
- [Towards Execution-Grounded Automated AI Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.14525/) (2026)
- [HCAST: Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.17354/) (2025)
- [SWE-Marathon: Can Agents Autonomously Complete Ultra-Long-Horizon Software Work?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.07682/) (2026)
- [Toward Generalist Autonomous Research via Hypothesis-Tree Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.11926/) (2026)
- [How to evaluate control measures for LLM agents? A trajectory from today to superintelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05259/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Frontier AI safety policies highlight automation of AI research and development (R&D) by AI agents as an important capability to anticipate. However, there exist few evaluations for AI R&D capabilities, and none that are highly realistic and have a direct comparison to human performance. We introduce RE-Bench (Research Engineering Benchmark, v1), which consists of 7 challenging, open-ended ML research engineering environments and data from 71 8-hour attempts by 61 distinct human experts. We confirm that our experts make progress in the environments given 8 hours, with 82% of expert attempts achieving a non-zero score and 24% matching or exceeding our strong reference solutions. We compare humans to several public frontier models through best-of-k with varying time budgets and agent designs, and find that the best AI agents achieve a score 4x higher than human experts when both are given a total time budget of 2 hours per environment. However, humans currently display better returns to increasing time budgets, narrowly exceeding the top AI agent scores given an 8-hour budget, and achieving 2x the score of the top AI agent when both are given 32 total hours (across different attempts). Qualitatively, we find that modern AI agents possess significant expertise in many ML topics -- e.g. an agent wrote a faster custom Triton kernel than any of our human experts' -- and can generate and test solutions over ten times faster than humans, at much lower cost. We open-source the evaluation environments, human expert data, analysis code and agent trajectories to facilitate future research.