# Assessing Gender Bias in LLMs: Comparing LLM Outputs with Human Perceptions and Official Statistics

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.13738 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.13738/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 5 of its 11 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07258/) (2021)
- [Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.06520/) (2016)
- [Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.07187/) (2016)
- [The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01326/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Rethinking LLM Bias Probing Using Lessons from the Social Sciences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.00093/) (2025)
- [More Women, Same Stereotypes: Unpacking the Gender Bias Paradox in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.15904/) (2025)
- [A word association network methodology for evaluating implicit biases in LLMs compared to humans](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.24488/) (2025)
- [A Close Reading Approach to Gender Narrative Biases in AI-Generated Stories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.09651/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This study investigates gender bias in large language models (LLMs) by comparing their gender perception to that of human respondents, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data, and a 50% no-bias benchmark. We created a new evaluation set using occupational data and role-specific sentences. Unlike common benchmarks included in LLM training data, our set is newly developed, preventing data leakage and test set contamination. Five LLMs were tested to predict the gender for each role using single-word answers. We used Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence to compare model outputs with human perceptions, statistical data, and the 50% neutrality benchmark. All LLMs showed significant deviation from gender neutrality and aligned more with statistical data, still reflecting inherent biases.