# Hyper-parameter Optimization for Federated Learning with Step-wise Adaptive Mechanism

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.12244 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.12244/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Nov 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.06127/) (2018)
- [Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.07481/) (2020)
- [Ditto: Fair and Robust Federated Learning Through Personalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.04221/) (2020)
- [Personalized Federated Learning with Moreau Envelopes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.08848/) (2020)
- [On Large-Cohort Training for Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.07820/) (2021)
- [Federated Hyperparameter Tuning: Challenges, Baselines, and Connections to Weight-Sharing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04502/) (2021)
- [Robust Federated Learning Through Representation Matching and Adaptive Hyper-parameters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.13075/) (2019)
- [FLoRA: Single-shot Hyper-parameter Optimization for Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08524/) (2021)
- [Group Knowledge Transfer: Federated Learning of Large CNNs at the Edge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.14513/) (2020)
- [FEATHERS: Federated Architecture and Hyperparameter Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.12342/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Auto-FL-Research: Agentic Search for Federated Learning Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.01366/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Learning (FL) is a decentralized learning approach that protects sensitive information by utilizing local model parameters rather than sharing clients' raw datasets. While this privacy-preserving method is widely employed across various applications, it still requires significant development and optimization. Automated Machine Learning (Auto-ML) has been adapted for reducing the need for manual adjustments. Previous studies have explored the integration of AutoML with different FL algorithms to evaluate their effectiveness in enhancing FL settings. However, Automated FL (Auto-FL) faces additional challenges due to the involvement of a large cohort of clients and global training rounds between clients and the server, rendering the tuning process time-consuming and nearly impossible on resource-constrained edge devices (e.g., IoT devices). This paper investigates the deployment and integration of two lightweight Hyper-Parameter Optimization (HPO) tools, Raytune and Optuna, within the context of FL settings. A step-wise feedback mechanism has also been designed to accelerate the hyper-parameter tuning process and coordinate AutoML toolkits with the FL server. To this end, both local and global feedback mechanisms are integrated to limit the search space and expedite the HPO process. Further, a novel client selection technique is introduced to mitigate the straggler effect in Auto-FL. The selected hyper-parameter tuning tools are evaluated using two benchmark datasets, FEMNIST, and CIFAR10. Further, the paper discusses the essential properties of successful HPO tools, the integration mechanism with the FL pipeline, and the challenges posed by the distributed and heterogeneous nature of FL environments.
