# Weak Permission is not Well-Founded, Grounded and Stable

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.10624 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.10624/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 0 of its 12 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2024.

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Deontic Argumentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.25781/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the notion of weak permission as the failure to conclude that the opposite obligation. We investigate the issue from the point of non-monotonic reasoning, specifically logic programming and structured argumentation, and we show that it is not possible to capture weak permission in the presence of deontic conflicts under the well-founded, grounded and (sceptical) stable semantics.