# Utilizing Human Behavior Modeling to Manipulate Explanations in AI-Assisted Decision Making: The Good, the Bad, and the Scary

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.10461 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.10461/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 36 of its 58 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 36)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02413/) (2016)
- [Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02508/) (2019)
- [Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.14779/) (2020)
- [Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.02114/) (2020)
- [Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.07810/) (2018)
- [Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.01831/) (2020)
- [Proxy Tasks and Subjective Measures Can Be Misleading in Evaluating Explainable AI Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08298/) (2020)
- [OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.11104/) (2022)
- [Counterfactual Explanations Can Be Manipulated](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.02666/) (2021)
- ["How do I fool you?": Manipulating User Trust via Misleading Black Box Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.06473/) (2019)
- [What I Cannot Predict, I Do Not Understand: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Explainability Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.04417/) (2021)
- ["Why is 'Chicago' deceptive?" Towards Building Model-Driven Tutorials for Humans](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.05871/) (2020)
- [Measuring a hate speech spectrum with faceted Rasch item response theory and perspective-aware, explainable-by-design deep learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.10277/) (2020)
- [Who Should I Trust: AI or Myself? Leveraging Human and AI Correctness Likelihood to Promote Appropriate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision-Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.05809/) (2023)
- [Understanding the Effect of Out-of-distribution Examples and Interactive Explanations on Human-AI Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.05303/) (2021)
- [Neural Media Bias Detection Using Distant Supervision With BABE -- Bias Annotations By Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14557/) (2022)
- [Do Explanations make VQA Models more Predictable to a Human?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.12366/) (2018)
- [Rethinking Explainability as a Dialogue: A Practitioner's Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.01875/) (2022)
- [Combining Human Predictions with Model Probabilities via Confusion Matrices and Calibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.14591/) (2021)
- [The Utility of Explainable AI in Ad Hoc Human-Machine Teaming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.03943/) (2022)
- [Teaching Humans When To Defer to a Classifier via Exemplars](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.11297/) (2021)
- [Selective Explanations: Leveraging Human Input to Align Explainable AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.09656/) (2023)
- [Human-Aligned Calibration for AI-Assisted Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00074/) (2023)
- [Explain, Edit, and Understand: Rethinking User Study Design for Evaluating Model Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.09669/) (2021)
- [Uncalibrated Models Can Improve Human-AI Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05983/) (2022)
- [When to Show a Suggestion? Integrating Human Feedback in AI-Assisted Programming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04930/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Plan-Then-Execute: An Empirical Study of User Trust and Team Performance When Using LLM Agents As A Daily Assistant](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01390/) (2025)
- [From Text to Trust: Empowering AI-assisted Decision Making with Adaptive LLM-powered Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11919/) (2025)
- [The Impact and Feasibility of Self-Confidence Shaping for AI-Assisted Decision-Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14311/) (2025)
- [Achieving Trustworthy Real-Time Decision Support Systems with Low-Latency Interpretable AI Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.20018/) (2025)
- [Explanations are a Means to an End: Decision Theoretic Explanation Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.22740/) (2025)
- [Human-LLM Collaborative Feature Engineering for Tabular Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.21060/) (2026)
- [Rules or Weights? Comparing User Understanding of Explainable AI Techniques with the Cognitive XAI-Adaptive Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.19620/) (2026)
- [CoAX: Cognitive-Oriented Attribution eXplanation User Model of Human Understanding of AI Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.27354/) (2026)
- [Human-Centric Reflective Architecture for Human-AI Collaborative Decision-Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.03025/) (2026)
- [Calibrating LLM Explanations to Human Decisions with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.17306/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in AI models have increased the integration of AI-based decision aids into the human decision making process. To fully unlock the potential of AI-assisted decision making, researchers have computationally modeled how humans incorporate AI recommendations into their final decisions, and utilized these models to improve human-AI team performance. Meanwhile, due to the ``black-box'' nature of AI models, providing AI explanations to human decision makers to help them rely on AI recommendations more appropriately has become a common practice. In this paper, we explore whether we can quantitatively model how humans integrate both AI recommendations and explanations into their decision process, and whether this quantitative understanding of human behavior from the learned model can be utilized to manipulate AI explanations, thereby nudging individuals towards making targeted decisions. Our extensive human experiments across various tasks demonstrate that human behavior can be easily influenced by these manipulated explanations towards targeted outcomes, regardless of the intent being adversarial or benign. Furthermore, individuals often fail to detect any anomalies in these explanations, despite their decisions being affected by them.