# Evaluating Loss Landscapes from a Topology Perspective

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.09807 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.09807/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 19 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Nets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.09913/) (2017)
- [Adversarial Machine Learning at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.01236/) (2016)
- [SWAD: Domain Generalization by Seeking Flat Minima](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.08604/) (2021)
- [PyHessian: Neural Networks Through the Lens of the Hessian](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.07145/) (2019)
- [Implicit Self-Regularization in Deep Neural Networks: Evidence from Random Matrix Theory and Implications for Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.01075/) (2018)
- [Qualitatively characterizing neural network optimization problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6544/) (2014)
- [Predicting trends in the quality of state-of-the-art neural networks without access to training or testing data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.06716/) (2020)
- [On Robustness and Transferability of Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.08558/) (2020)
- [The Topology ToolKit](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.09110/) (2018)
- [Taxonomizing local versus global structure in neural network loss landscapes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.11228/) (2021)
- [Evaluating natural language processing models with generalization metrics that do not need access to any training or testing data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.02842/) (2022)
- [A Three-regime Model of Network Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18383/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Block-Biased Mamba for Long-Range Sequence Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09022/) (2025)
- [Landscaper: Understanding Loss Landscapes Through Multi-Dimensional Topological Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.07135/) (2026)
- [A Geometric Perspective on Stabilizing Value Conflict Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.17946/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Characterizing the loss of a neural network with respect to model parameters, i.e., the loss landscape, can provide valuable insights into properties of that model. Various methods for visualizing loss landscapes have been proposed, but less emphasis has been placed on quantifying and extracting actionable and reproducible insights from these complex representations. Inspired by powerful tools from topological data analysis (TDA) for summarizing the structure of high-dimensional data, here we characterize the underlying shape (or topology) of loss landscapes, quantifying the topology to reveal new insights about neural networks. To relate our findings to the machine learning (ML) literature, we compute simple performance metrics (e.g., accuracy, error), and we characterize the local structure of loss landscapes using Hessian-based metrics (e.g., largest eigenvalue, trace, eigenvalue spectral density). Following this approach, we study established models from image pattern recognition (e.g., ResNets) and scientific ML (e.g., physics-informed neural networks), and we show how quantifying the shape of loss landscapes can provide new insights into model performance and learning dynamics.
