# Software Performance Engineering for Foundation Model-Powered Software

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.09580 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.09580/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 48 of its 96 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 48)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07258/) (2021)
- [Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15556/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11432/) (2023)
- [Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01680/) (2024)
- [ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07201/) (2023)
- [Efficient Large-Scale Language Model Training on GPU Clusters Using Megatron-LM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.04473/) (2021)
- [Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04091/) (2023)
- [Cognitive Architectures for Language Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.02427/) (2023)
- [Personal LLM Agents: Insights and Survey about the Capability, Efficiency and Security](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05459/) (2024)
- [RepairAgent: An Autonomous, LLM-Based Agent for Program Repair](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.17134/) (2024)
- [Language Model Tokenizers Introduce Unfairness Between Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15425/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Efficient Inference for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14294/) (2024)
- [SARATHI: Efficient LLM Inference by Piggybacking Decodes with Chunked Prefills](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.16369/) (2023)
- [Llumnix: Dynamic Scheduling for Large Language Model Serving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.03243/) (2024)
- [Speculative Decoding with Big Little Decoder](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07863/) (2023)
- [LLM Inference Unveiled: Survey and Roofline Model Insights](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16363/) (2024)
- [Fast Distributed Inference Serving for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.05920/) (2023)
- [Inference without Interference: Disaggregate LLM Inference for Mixed Downstream Workloads](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.11181/) (2024)
- [Serving DNNs like Clockwork: Performance Predictability from the Bottom Up](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.02464/) (2020)
- [Guiding LLMs The Right Way: Fast, Non-Invasive Constrained Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.06988/) (2024)
- [Parrot: Efficient Serving of LLM-based Applications with Semantic Variable](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19888/) (2024)
- [A Survey of Resource-efficient LLM and Multimodal Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.08092/) (2024)
- [BOLAA: Benchmarking and Orchestrating LLM-augmented Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.05960/) (2023)
- [AutoML-GPT: Automatic Machine Learning with GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02499/) (2023)
- [ISR-LLM: Iterative Self-Refined Large Language Model for Long-Horizon Sequential Task Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.13724/) (2023)
- [Beyond Efficiency: A Systematic Survey of Resource-Efficient Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.00625/) (2024)
- [Model Compression and Efficient Inference for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09748/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The rise of Foundation Models (FMs) like Large Language Models (LLMs) is revolutionizing software development. Despite the impressive prototypes, transforming FMware into production-ready products demands complex engineering across various domains. A critical but overlooked aspect is performance engineering, which aims at ensuring FMware meets performance goals such as throughput and latency to avoid user dissatisfaction and financial loss. Often, performance considerations are an afterthought, leading to costly optimization efforts post-deployment. FMware's high computational resource demands highlight the need for efficient hardware use. Continuous performance engineering is essential to prevent degradation. This paper highlights the significance of Software Performance Engineering (SPE) in FMware, identifying four key challenges: cognitive architecture design (i.e., the structural design that defines how AI components interact, reason, and interface with classical software components), communication protocols, tuning and optimization, and deployment. These challenges are based on literature surveys and experiences from developing an in-house FMware system. We discuss problems, current practices, and innovative paths for the software engineering community.