# Your Semantic-Independent Watermark is Fragile: A Semantic Perturbation Attack against EaaS Watermark

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.09359 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.09359/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [Pointer Sentinel Mixture Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.07843/) (2016)
- [Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.01626/) (2015)
- [Turning Your Weakness Into a Strength: Watermarking Deep Neural Networks by Backdooring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.04633/) (2018)
- [Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.02766/) (2018)
- [Evaluation of Output Embeddings for Fine-Grained Image Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.8403/) (2014)
- [Embedding-based Retrieval in Facebook Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11632/) (2020)
- [Thieves on Sesame Street! Model Extraction of BERT-based APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.12366/) (2019)
- [Exploring Connections Between Active Learning and Model Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.02054/) (2018)
- [A survey of deep neural network watermarking techniques](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.09274/) (2021)
- [Joint Embedding of Words and Labels for Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04174/) (2018)
- [Towards Data-Free Model Stealing in a Hard Label Setting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.11022/) (2022)
- [Can't Steal? Cont-Steal! Contrastive Stealing Attacks Against Image Encoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.07513/) (2022)
- [BadActs: A Universal Backdoor Defense in the Activation Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.11227/) (2024)
- [Rethinking White-Box Watermarks on Deep Learning Models under Neural Structural Obfuscation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.09732/) (2023)
- [WARDEN: Multi-Directional Backdoor Watermarks for Embedding-as-a-Service Copyright Protection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.01472/) (2024)
- [Watermarking Vision-Language Pre-trained Models for Multi-modal Embedding as a Service](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05863/) (2023)
- [WET: Overcoming Paraphrasing Vulnerabilities in Embeddings-as-a-Service with Linear Transformation Watermarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.04459/) (2024)
- [Box-Free Model Watermarks Are Prone to Black-Box Removal Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.09863/) (2024)
- [DeepEclipse: How to Break White-Box DNN-Watermarking Schemes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03590/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Embedding-as-a-Service (EaaS) has emerged as a successful business pattern but faces significant challenges related to various forms of copyright infringement, particularly, the API misuse and model extraction attacks. Various studies have proposed backdoor-based watermarking schemes to protect the copyright of EaaS services. In this paper, we reveal that previous watermarking schemes possess semantic-independent characteristics and propose the Semantic Perturbation Attack (SPA). Our theoretical and experimental analysis demonstrate that this semantic-independent nature makes current watermarking schemes vulnerable to adaptive attacks that exploit semantic perturbations tests to bypass watermark verification. Extensive experimental results across multiple datasets demonstrate that the True Positive Rate (TPR) for identifying watermarked samples under SPA can reach up to more than 95%, rendering watermarks ineffective while maintaining the high utility of embeddings. Furthermore, we discuss potential defense strategies to mitigate SPA. Our code is available at https://github.com/Zk4-ps/EaaS-Embedding-Watermark.
