# A Social Outcomes and Priorities centered (SOP) Framework for AI policy

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.08241 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.08241/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 84 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.07805/) (2020)
- [A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05232/) (2023)
- [Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.07646/) (2022)
- [Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17035/) (2023)
- [What Does it Mean for a Language Model to Preserve Privacy?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05520/) (2022)
- [Hallucination-Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading AI Legal Research Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20362/) (2024)
- [SciAgents: Automating scientific discovery through multi-agent intelligent graph reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.05556/) (2024)
- [Here Comes The AI Worm: Unleashing Zero-click Worms that Target GenAI-Powered Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02817/) (2024)
- [What's in a Name? Auditing Large Language Models for Race and Gender Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14875/) (2024)
- [Open-Sourcing Highly Capable Foundation Models: An evaluation of risks, benefits, and alternative methods for pursuing open-source objectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09227/) (2023)
- [On-Policy Self-Alignment with Fine-grained Knowledge Feedback for Hallucination Mitigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12221/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Rapid developments in AI and its adoption across various domains have necessitated a need to build robust guardrails and risk containment plans while ensuring equitable benefits for the betterment of society. The current technology-centered approach has resulted in a fragmented, reactive, and ineffective policy apparatus. This paper highlights the immediate and urgent need to pivot to a society-centered approach to develop comprehensive, coherent, forward-looking AI policy. To this end, we present a Social Outcomes and Priorities centered (SOP) framework for AI policy along with proposals on implementation of its various components. While the SOP framework is presented from a US-centric view, the takeaways are general and applicable globally.