# What Should Baby Models Read? Exploring Sample-Efficient Data Composition on Model Performance

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.06672 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.06672/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Nov 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07461/) (2018)
- [Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gopher](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.11446/) (2021)
- [GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.06905/) (2021)
- [It's Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.07118/) (2020)
- [BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for English](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.00582/) (2019)
- [TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07759/) (2023)
- [DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model Pretraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10429/) (2023)
- [Teaching Small Language Models to Reason](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08410/) (2022)
- [Beyond Chinchilla-Optimal: Accounting for Inference in Language Model Scaling Laws](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.00448/) (2023)
- [A standardized Project Gutenberg corpus for statistical analysis of natural language and quantitative linguistics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.08092/) (2018)
- [Baby Llama: knowledge distillation from an ensemble of teachers trained on a small dataset with no performance penalty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02019/) (2023)
- [Elements of World Knowledge (EWoK): A Cognition-Inspired Framework for Evaluating Basic World Knowledge in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.09605/) (2024)
- [[Call for Papers] The 2nd BabyLM Challenge: Sample-efficient pretraining on a developmentally plausible corpus](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.06214/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Do Construction Distributions Shape Formal Language Learning In German BabyLMs?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.11593/) (2025)
- [Towards Infinite Length Extrapolation: A Unified Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.06113/) (2026)
- [Child-directed speech facilitates production, not comprehension, in BabyLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.01045/) (2026)
- [Looped GPT-BERT: Trading Parameters for Computation in Small Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.09691/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We explore the impact of pre-training data composition on the performance of small language models in a sample-efficient setting. Using datasets limited to 10 million words, we evaluate several dataset sources, including child-directed speech (CHILDES), classic books (Gutenberg), synthetic data (TinyStories), and a mix of these (Mix) across different model sizes ranging from 18 million to 705 million parameters. Our experiments show that smaller models (e.g., GPT2-97M, GPT2-705M, Llama-360M) perform better when trained on more complex and rich datasets like Gutenberg. Models trained on the CHILDES and TinyStories datasets underperformed across all model sizes. These findings suggest that the optimal dataset for sample efficient training depends on the model size, and that neither child-directed speech nor simplified stories are optimal for language models of all sizes. We highlight the importance of considering both dataset composition and model capacity for effective sample efficient language model training.
