# Explainable AI Through a Democratic Lens: DhondtXAI for D'Hondt-Projected Feature Attribution

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.05196 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.05196/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 1 of its 14 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Introducing δ-XAI: a novel sensitivity-based method for local AI explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18343/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This study presents DhondtXAI as a SHAP-independent, D'Hondt-based attribution framework for tabular XAI. Instead of model-native feature importance or SHAP values, DhondtXAI computes background-interventional removal effects, separates positive and negative evidence, forms optional feature alliances, applies optional thresholds, allocates seats via the D'Hondt rule, and projects onto the local model-output difference. Completeness is preserved by construction, with the projection residual ratio reported as a diagnostic. The method is evaluated on synthetic additive and interaction tests, correlated-feature perturbations, operator and apportionment ablations, projection-mode comparisons, logit-scale checks, repeated split validation, paired deletion tests, and two healthcare datasets: Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (CatBoost) and early-stage diabetes risk prediction (XGBoost). SHAP serves only as an external comparator with aligned settings. In additive synthetics, DhondtXAI exactly recovers ground-truth rankings; in multiplicative interactions, alliances reduce the mean projection residual from 0.2527 to 0.0001. On WDBC and diabetes data, it shows high agreement with SHAP (Spearman rho = 0.9273 and 0.9353), supported by further signed, top-k, magnitude, deletion, and sensitivity analyses. Results position DhondtXAI as a complementary proportional, alliance-aware, and threshold-aware tabular XAI method, not a replacement for SHAP or LIME.