# On the Impact of White-box Deployment Strategies for Edge AI on Latency and Model Performance

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00907 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00907/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 73 of its 133 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 73)

- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0575/) (2014)
- [GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07461/) (2018)
- [Wide Residual Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.07146/) (2016)
- [Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.05431/) (2016)
- [Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1510.00149/) (2015)
- [Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02626/) (2015)
- [Knowledge Distillation: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.05525/) (2020)
- [Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.05877/) (2017)
- [A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.13630/) (2021)
- [SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.02340/) (2018)
- [Learned Step Size Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.08153/) (2019)
- [Up or Down? Adaptive Rounding for Post-Training Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.10568/) (2020)
- [DoReFa-Net: Training Low Bitwidth Convolutional Neural Networks with Low Bitwidth Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.06160/) (2016)
- [BRECQ: Pushing the Limit of Post-Training Quantization by Block Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.05426/) (2021)
- [PACT: Parameterized Clipping Activation for Quantized Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.06085/) (2018)
- [HAWQ: Hessian AWare Quantization of Neural Networks with Mixed-Precision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.03696/) (2019)
- [Deep Learning with Limited Numerical Precision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.02551/) (2015)
- [Data-Free Quantization Through Weight Equalization and Bias Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.04721/) (2019)
- [ZeroQ: A Novel Zero Shot Quantization Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.00281/) (2020)
- [FastBERT: a Self-distilling BERT with Adaptive Inference Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.02178/) (2020)
- [Model Pruning Enables Efficient Federated Learning on Edge Devices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.12326/) (2019)
- [Low-bit Quantization of Neural Networks for Efficient Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.06822/) (2019)
- [LSQ+: Improving low-bit quantization through learnable offsets and better initialization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.09576/) (2020)
- [Improving Neural Network Quantization without Retraining using Outlier Channel Splitting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.09504/) (2019)
- [Training with Quantization Noise for Extreme Model Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07320/) (2020)
- [Fixed Point Quantization of Deep Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.06393/) (2015)
- [Designing Energy-Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks using Energy-Aware Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.05128/) (2016)
- [Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.08349/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Achieving Trustworthy Real-Time Decision Support Systems with Low-Latency Interpretable AI Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.20018/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

To help MLOps engineers decide which operator to use in which deployment scenario, this study aims to empirically assess the accuracy vs latency trade-off of white-box (training-based) and black-box operators (non-training-based) and their combinations in an Edge AI setup. We perform inference experiments including 3 white-box (i.e., QAT, Pruning, Knowledge Distillation), 2 black-box (i.e., Partition, SPTQ), and their combined operators (i.e., Distilled SPTQ, SPTQ Partition) across 3 tiers (i.e., Mobile, Edge, Cloud) on 4 commonly-used Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing models to identify the effective strategies, considering the perspective of MLOps Engineers. Our Results indicate that the combination of Distillation and SPTQ operators (i.e., DSPTQ) should be preferred over non-hybrid operators when lower latency is required in the edge at small to medium accuracy drop. Among the non-hybrid operators, the Distilled operator is a better alternative in both mobile and edge tiers for lower latency performance at the cost of small to medium accuracy loss. Moreover, the operators involving distillation show lower latency in resource-constrained tiers (Mobile, Edge) compared to the operators involving Partitioning across Mobile and Edge tiers. For textual subject models, which have low input data size requirements, the Cloud tier is a better alternative for the deployment of operators than the Mobile, Edge, or Mobile-Edge tier (the latter being used for operators involving partitioning). In contrast, for image-based subject models, which have high input data size requirements, the Edge tier is a better alternative for operators than Mobile, Edge, or their combination.