# GRADE: Quantifying Sample Diversity in Text-to-Image Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.22592 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.22592/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 26 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 26 of 26)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.05233/) (2021)
- [SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01952/) (2023)
- [Going Deeper with Convolutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.4842/) (2014)
- [Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03206/) (2024)
- [LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.08402/) (2022)
- [Improved Techniques for Training GANs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.03498/) (2016)
- [Demystifying MMD GANs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.01401/) (2018)
- [Improved Precision and Recall Metric for Assessing Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.06991/) (2019)
- [Adversarial Diffusion Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17042/) (2023)
- [Reliable Fidelity and Diversity Metrics for Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.09797/) (2020)
- [Assessing Generative Models via Precision and Recall](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.00035/) (2018)
- [The Vendi Score: A Diversity Evaluation Metric for Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02410/) (2022)
- [Rethinking FID: Towards a Better Evaluation Metric for Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.09603/) (2023)
- [The Role of ImageNet Classes in Fr'echet Inception Distance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.06026/) (2022)
- [LCM-LoRA: A Universal Stable-Diffusion Acceleration Module](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05556/) (2023)
- [Inverse Scaling: When Bigger Isn't Better](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09479/) (2023)
- [How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating and Auditing Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.08921/) (2021)
- [Effectively Unbiased FID and Inception Score and where to find them](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.07023/) (2019)
- [The Bias Amplification Paradox in Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00755/) (2023)
- [OpenBias: Open-set Bias Detection in Text-to-Image Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07990/) (2024)
- [DALLE-2 is Seeing Double: Flaws in Word-to-Concept Mapping in Text2Image Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.10606/) (2022)
- [Underspecification in Scene Description-to-Depiction Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.05815/) (2022)
- [Cousins Of The Vendi Score: A Family Of Similarity-Based Diversity Metrics For Science And Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12952/) (2023)
- [Attribute Based Interpretable Evaluation Metrics for Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17261/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Generating an Image From 1,000 Words: Enhancing Text-to-Image With Structured Captions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.06876/) (2025)
- [DIMCIM: A Quantitative Evaluation Framework for Default-mode Diversity and Generalization in Text-to-Image Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05108/) (2025)
- [RefVNLI: Towards Scalable Evaluation of Subject-driven Text-to-image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.17502/) (2025)
- [CAIRe: Cultural Attribution of Images by Retrieval-Augmented Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09109/) (2025)
- [MineTheGap: Automatic Mining of Biases in Text-to-Image Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.13427/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce GRADE, an automatic method for quantifying sample diversity in text-to-image models. Our method leverages the world knowledge embedded in large language models and visual question-answering systems to identify relevant concept-specific axes of diversity (e.g., ``shape'' for the concept ``cookie''). It then estimates frequency distributions of concepts and their attributes and quantifies diversity using entropy. We use GRADE to measure the diversity of 12 models over a total of 720K images, revealing that all models display limited variation, with clear deterioration in stronger models. Further, we find that models often exhibit default behaviors, a phenomenon where a model consistently generates concepts with the same attributes (e.g., 98% of the cookies are round). Lastly, we show that a key reason for low diversity is underspecified captions in training data. Our work proposes an automatic, semantically-driven approach to measure sample diversity and highlights the stunning homogeneity in text-to-image models.