# Have LLMs Reopened the Pandora's Box of AI-Generated Fake News?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19250 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.19250/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.01967/) (2017)
- [Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13788/) (2023)
- [Fake News in Sheep's Clothing: Robust Fake News Detection Against LLM-Empowered Style Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10830/) (2023)
- [Fighting Fire with Fire: The Dual Role of LLMs in Crafting and Detecting Elusive Disinformation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15515/) (2023)
- [Disinformation Detection: An Evolving Challenge in the Age of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15847/) (2023)
- [Implementing BERT and fine-tuned RobertA to detect AI generated news by ChatGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07401/) (2023)
- [LLM Detectors Still Fall Short of Real World: Case of LLM-Generated Short News-Like Posts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.03291/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [The Facade of Truth: Uncovering and Mitigating LLM Susceptibility to Deceptive Evidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.05478/) (2026)
- [ChartAttack: Testing the Vulnerability of LLMs to Malicious Prompting in Chart Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.12983/) (2026)
- [CoT is Not the Chain of Truth: An Empirical Internal Analysis of Reasoning LLMs for Fake News Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.04856/) (2026)
- [Many Ways to Be Fake: Benchmarking Fake News Detection Under Strategy-Driven AI Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.09514/) (2026)
- [Large Language Models in Misinformation Ecosystems: Misuse, Defense, and Vulnerability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.10402/) (2026)
- [VEX-Bench: Benchmarking Verification Complexity of LLM-Generated Misinformation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.35028/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

With the rise of AI-generated content spewed at scale from large language models (LLMs), genuine concerns about the spread of fake news have intensified. The perceived ability of LLMs to produce convincing fake news at scale poses new challenges for both human and automated fake news detection systems. To address this gap, this paper presents the findings from a university-level competition that aimed to explore how LLMs can be used by humans to create fake news, and to assess the ability of human annotators and AI models to detect it. A total of 110 participants used LLMs to create 252 unique fake news stories, and 84 annotators participated in the detection tasks. Our findings indicate that LLMs are ~68% more effective at detecting real news than humans. However, for fake news detection, the performance of LLMs and humans remains comparable (~60% accuracy). Additionally, we examine the impact of visual elements (e.g., pictures) in news on the accuracy of detecting fake news stories. Finally, we also examine various strategies used by fake news creators to enhance the credibility of their AI-generated content. This work highlights the increasing complexity of detecting AI-generated fake news, particularly in collaborative human-AI settings.