# Inference time LLM alignment in single and multidomain preference spectrum

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19206 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.19206/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 22 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [LLM preference optimization methods](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/llm-preference-optimization-methods/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)
- [Mistral 7B](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06825/) (2023)
- [Learning to summarize from human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01325/) (2020)
- [Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03341/) (2023)
- [Editing Models with Task Arithmetic](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04089/) (2022)
- [A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12036/) (2023)
- [BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.04657/) (2023)
- [TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01708/) (2023)
- [A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models: Techniques and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07927/) (2024)
- [Scaling Synthetic Data Creation with 1,000,000,000 Personas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.20094/) (2024)
- [LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11462/) (2023)
- [SteerLM: Attribute Conditioned SFT as an (User-Steerable) Alternative to RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05344/) (2023)
- [Controllable Preference Optimization: Toward Controllable Multi-Objective Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.19085/) (2024)
- [InferAligner: Inference-Time Alignment for Harmlessness through Cross-Model Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.11206/) (2024)
- [Decoding-time Realignment of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02992/) (2024)
- [DeAL: Decoding-time Alignment for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06147/) (2024)
- [Prompting AI Art: An Investigation into the Creative Skill of Prompt Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13534/) (2023)
- [Ethos: Rectifying Language Models in Orthogonal Parameter Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08994/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Tokenized Bandit for LLM Decoding and Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07276/) (2025)
- [Robust Preference Alignment via Directional Neighborhood Consensus](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.20498/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Aligning Large Language Models (LLM) to address subjectivity and nuanced preference levels requires adequate flexibility and control, which can be a resource-intensive and time-consuming procedure. Existing training-time alignment methods require full re-training when a change is needed and inference-time ones typically require access to the reward model at each inference step. To address these limitations, we introduce inference-time model alignment method that learns encoded representations of preference dimensions, called textitAlignment Vectors (AV). These representations are computed by subtraction of the base model from the aligned model as in model editing enabling dynamically adjusting the model behavior during inference through simple linear operations. Even though the preference dimensions can span various granularity levels, here we focus on three gradual response levels across three specialized domains: medical, legal, and financial, exemplifying its practical potential. This new alignment paradigm introduces adjustable preference knobs during inference, allowing users to tailor their LLM outputs while reducing the inference cost by half compared to the prompt engineering approach. Additionally, we find that AVs are transferable across different fine-tuning stages of the same model, demonstrating their flexibility. AVs also facilitate multidomain, diverse preference alignment, making the process 12x faster than the retraining approach.