# Retrieving Implicit and Explicit Emotional Events Using Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19128 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.19128/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 15 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [OLMoE: Open Mixture-of-Experts Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.02060/) (2024)
- [Emotion-Cause Pair Extraction: A New Task to Emotion Analysis in Texts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.01267/) (2019)
- [MM-DFN: Multimodal Dynamic Fusion Network for Emotion Recognition in Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02385/) (2022)
- [CoMPM: Context Modeling with Speaker's Pre-trained Memory Tracking for Emotion Recognition in Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.11626/) (2021)
- [Concept Space Alignment in Multilingual LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.01079/) (2024)
- [UniMEEC: Towards Unified Multimodal Emotion Recognition and Emotion Cause](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.00403/) (2024)
- [Probing Cross-modal Semantics Alignment Capability from the Textual Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09550/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have garnered significant attention in recent years due to their impressive performance. While considerable research has evaluated these models from various perspectives, the extent to which LLMs can perform implicit and explicit emotion retrieval remains largely unexplored. To address this gap, this study investigates LLMs' emotion retrieval capabilities in commonsense. Through extensive experiments involving multiple models, we systematically evaluate the ability of LLMs on emotion retrieval. Specifically, we propose a supervised contrastive probing method to verify LLMs' performance for implicit and explicit emotion retrieval, as well as the diversity of the emotional events they retrieve. The results offer valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of LLMs in handling emotion retrieval.