# Evaluating Explanations Through LLMs: Beyond Traditional User Studies

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17781 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17781/

## Key facts

- Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 26 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 26 of 26)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- [Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6034/) (2013)
- [Qwen2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10671/) (2024)
- [Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10045/) (2019)
- [Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.08608/) (2017)
- [Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.11279/) (2017)
- [Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00399/) (2017)
- [Concept Bottleneck Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.04612/) (2020)
- [Large Language Models Are Zero-Shot Time Series Forecasters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07820/) (2023)
- [CheXNet: Radiologist-Level Pneumonia Detection on Chest X-Rays with Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.05225/) (2017)
- [AI safety via debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.00899/) (2018)
- [Scalable and accurate deep learning for electronic health records](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.07860/) (2018)
- [TabLLM: Few-shot Classification of Tabular Data with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.10723/) (2022)
- [Synthetic Data Generation with Large Language Models for Text Classification: Potential and Limitations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07849/) (2023)
- [What I Cannot Predict, I Do Not Understand: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Explainability Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.04417/) (2021)
- [Towards Human-centered Explainable AI: A Survey of User Studies for Model Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11584/) (2022)
- [If Only We Had Better Counterfactual Explanations: Five Key Deficits to Rectify in the Evaluation of Counterfactual XAI Techniques](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.01035/) (2021)
- [HEALNet: Multimodal Fusion for Heterogeneous Biomedical Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09115/) (2023)
- [VCNet: A self-explaining model for realistic counterfactual generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10847/) (2022)
- [An Actionability Assessment Tool for Explainable AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.09516/) (2024)
- [A Brief Review of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01543/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [ConSim: Measuring Concept-Based Explanations' Effectiveness with Automated Simulatability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.05855/) (2025)
- [Integrating Counterfactual Simulations with Language Models for Explaining Multi-Agent Behaviour](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17801/) (2025)
- [Predicting Satisfaction of Counterfactual Explanations from Human Ratings of Explanatory Qualities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13899/) (2025)
- [Quality Without Usefulness: LLM-Generated XAI Narratives as Trust Heuristics Rather Than Decision Aids](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.26770/) (2026)
- [CoAX: Cognitive-Oriented Attribution eXplanation User Model of Human Understanding of AI Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.27354/) (2026)
- [Seeking Information with RAG-Assistants: Does Model Size Matter in Human-AI Collaborations?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00964/) (2026)
- [Evaluating RL Explainability Methods by How Much They Help Fix Bugs in Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.17524/) (2026)
- [Limitations of Automated Simulatability: LLM Simulators Can Bypass Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.08585/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As AI becomes fundamental in sectors like healthcare, explainable AI (XAI) tools are essential for trust and transparency. However, traditional user studies used to evaluate these tools are often costly, time consuming, and difficult to scale. In this paper, we explore the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to replicate human participants to help streamline XAI evaluation. We reproduce a user study comparing counterfactual and causal explanations, replicating human participants with seven LLMs under various settings. Our results show that (i) LLMs can replicate most conclusions from the original study, (ii) different LLMs yield varying levels of alignment in the results, and (iii) experimental factors such as LLM memory and output variability affect alignment with human responses. These initial findings suggest that LLMs could provide a scalable and cost-effective way to simplify qualitative XAI evaluation.