# Science Out of Its Ivory Tower: Improving Accessibility with Reinforcement Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17088 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17088/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 20 of its 65 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/knowledge-and-tool-augmented-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.13461/) (2019)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embedding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09864/) (2021)
- [Learning to summarize from human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01325/) (2020)
- [Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.08593/) (2019)
- [Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.08745/) (2018)
- [Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08295/) (2024)
- [Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01693/) (2023)
- [The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.01552/) (2023)
- [Is Reinforcement Learning (Not) for Natural Language Processing: Benchmarks, Baselines, and Building Blocks for Natural Language Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01241/) (2022)
- [Making Science Simple: Corpora for the Lay Summarisation of Scientific Literature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09932/) (2022)
- [Paragraph-level Simplification of Medical Texts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.05767/) (2021)
- [The N+ Implementation Details of RLHF with PPO: A Case Study on TL;DR Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.17031/) (2024)
- [Integrating Transformer and Paraphrase Rules for Sentence Simplification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.11193/) (2018)
- [Evaluating prose style transfer with the Bible](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.04731/) (2017)
- [Multilingual Simplification of Medical Texts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12532/) (2023)
- [Simplifying Scholarly Abstracts for Accessible Digital Libraries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03899/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Explanatory Summarization with Discourse-Driven Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.19339/) (2025)
- [Speaking at the Right Level: Literacy-Controlled Counterspeech Generation with RAG-RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.01058/) (2025)
- [Fairness Evaluation of Large Language Models in Academic Library Reference Services](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.04224/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

A vast amount of scholarly work is published daily, yet much of it remains inaccessible to the general public due to dense jargon and complex language. To address this challenge in science communication, we introduce a reinforcement learning framework that fine-tunes a language model to rewrite scholarly abstracts into more comprehensible versions. Guided by a carefully balanced combination of word- and sentence-level accessibility rewards, our language model effectively substitutes technical terms with more accessible alternatives, a task which models supervised fine-tuned or guided by conventional readability measures struggle to accomplish. Our best model adjusts the readability level of scholarly abstracts by approximately six U.S. grade levels -- in other words, from a postgraduate to a high school level. This translates to roughly a 90% relative boost over the supervised fine-tuning baseline, all while maintaining factual accuracy and high-quality language. An in-depth analysis of our approach shows that balanced rewards lead to systematic modifications in the base model, likely contributing to smoother optimization and superior performance. We envision this work as a step toward bridging the gap between scholarly research and the general public, particularly younger readers and those without a college degree.