# Geographical Node Clustering and Grouping to Guarantee Data IIDness in Federated Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.15693 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.15693/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Federated Learning with Non-IID Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.00582/) (2018)
- [Federated Multi-Task Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.10467/) (2017)
- [Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.11875/) (2019)
- [The Non-IID Data Quagmire of Decentralized Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.00189/) (2019)
- [FjORD: Fair and Accurate Federated Learning under heterogeneous targets with Ordered Dropout](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.13451/) (2021)
- [Distillation-Based Semi-Supervised Federated Learning for Communication-Efficient Collaborative Training with Non-IID Private Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.06180/) (2020)
- [Cost-Effective Federated Learning Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.08336/) (2020)
- [An Amateur Drone Surveillance System Based on Cognitive Internet of Things](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.10738/) (2017)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [C2FL: Clustered Continual Federated Learning under Spatial and Temporal Drift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.18003/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning (FL) is a decentralized AI mechanism suitable for a large number of devices like in smart IoT. A major challenge of FL is the non-IID dataset problem, originating from the heterogeneous data collected by FL participants, leading to performance deterioration of the trained global model. There have been various attempts to rectify non-IID dataset, mostly focusing on manipulating the collected data. This paper, however, proposes a novel approach to ensure data IIDness by properly clustering and grouping mobile IoT nodes exploiting their geographical characteristics, so that each FL group can achieve IID dataset. We first provide an experimental evidence for the independence and identicalness features of IoT data according to the inter-device distance, and then propose Dynamic Clustering and Partial-Steady Grouping algorithms that partition FL participants to achieve near-IIDness in their dataset while considering device mobility. Our mechanism significantly outperforms benchmark grouping algorithms at least by 110 times in terms of the joint cost between the number of dropout devices and the evenness in per-group device count, with a mild increase in the number of groups only by up to 0.93 groups.