# Subversive Characters and Stereotyping Readers: Characterizing Queer Relationalities with Dialogue-Based Relation Extraction

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14978 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14978/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05150/) (2020)
- [Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.00033/) (2018)
- [SummScreen: A Dataset for Abstractive Screenplay Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.07091/) (2021)
- [Dialogue-Based Relation Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.08056/) (2020)
- [A Domain Based Approach to Social Relation Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.06456/) (2017)
- [TVShowGuess: Character Comprehension in Stories as Speaker Guessing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.07721/) (2022)
- [Hierarchical Dialogue Understanding with Special Tokens and Turn-level Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.00262/) (2023)
- [Unsupervised Learning of Hierarchical Conversation Structure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12244/) (2022)
- [Empirical Analysis of Dialogue Relation Extraction with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.17802/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Multimodal Conversation Structure Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17536/) (2025)
- [Language Models as Measurement Apparatus for Culture](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.02459/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Television is often seen as a site for subcultural identification and subversive fantasy, including in queer cultures. How might we measure subversion, or the degree to which the depiction of social relationship between a dyad (e.g. two characters who are colleagues) deviates from its typical representation on TV? To explore this question, we introduce the task of stereotypic relationship extraction. Built on cognitive stylistics, linguistic anthropology, and dialogue relation extraction, in this paper, we attempt to model the cognitive process of stereotyping TV characters in dialogic interactions. Given a dyad, we want to predict: what social relationship do the speakers exhibit through their words? Subversion is then characterized by the discrepancy between the distribution of the model's predictions and the ground truth labels. To demonstrate the usefulness of this task and gesture at a methodological intervention, we enclose four case studies to characterize the representation of queer relationalities in the Big Bang Theory, Frasier, and Gilmore Girls, as we explore the suspicious and reparative modes of reading with our computational methods.
