# Hierarchical Reinforced Trader (HRT): A Bi-Level Approach for Optimizing Stock Selection and Execution

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14927 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14927/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.02971/) (2015)
- [Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.09477/) (2018)
- [Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.01783/) (2016)
- [Qlib: An AI-oriented Quantitative Investment Platform](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.11189/) (2020)
- [FinRL: Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework to Automate Trading in Quantitative Finance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09395/) (2021)
- [Practical Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Stock Trading](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.07522/) (2018)
- [Dynamic Datasets and Market Environments for Financial Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13174/) (2023)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Trading Automation in The Stock Market](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.07165/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [A Survey of Financial AI: Architectures, Advances and Open Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.12747/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Automated equity trading requires converting noisy market and news signals into executable portfolio decisions under risk, turnover, and transaction costs. We propose Hierarchical Reinforced Trader (HRT), a bi-level reinforcement learning framework for text-aware portfolio management in multi-asset equity markets. HRT separates trading into two coordinated decisions: a factorized sparse High-Level Controller (HLC) selects asset-level increase, reduce, or hold directions from compact market and text-derived signals, while a risk-aware Low-Level Controller (LLC) converts these directions into feasible portfolio weight adjustments under turnover, drawdown, and text-risk penalties. This decomposition avoids enumerating the full joint action space and makes selection and execution easier to inspect. We evaluate HRT on an open stock-news benchmark with a fixed 89-stock Nasdaq universe, using 2013--2018 for training, 2019 for validation, and 2020--2023 for final out-of-sample testing; the test horizon is restricted to 2020--2023 due to public benchmark data availability under the same timestamp-clean text-aware protocol. Across market-proxy, same-universe portfolio, alpha-only, flat-RL, and hierarchical ablation baselines, HRT delivers the strongest learning-based return--risk--cost trade-off. The full model improves Sharpe from 1.06 for HRT-Base to 1.24, reduces daily turnover from 0.112 to 0.090, and remains robust under transaction-cost stress. These results suggest that separating sparse directional selection from risk-aware execution is an effective way to incorporate market forecasts and text-derived risk signals into portfolio management.