# From Citations to Criticality: Predicting Legal Decision Influence in the Multilingual Swiss Jurisprudence

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.13460 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13460/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01108/) (2019)
- [Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02116/) (2019)
- [mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11934/) (2020)
- [MiniLM: Deep Self-Attention Distillation for Task-Agnostic Compression of Pre-Trained Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.10957/) (2020)
- [DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09543/) (2021)
- [Cross-lingual Language Model Pretraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.07291/) (2019)
- [Measuring and Improving Consistency in Pretrained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.01017/) (2021)
- [Do Prompt-Based Models Really Understand the Meaning of their Prompts?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01247/) (2021)
- [Neural Legal Judgment Prediction in English](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02059/) (2019)
- [Lifting the Curse of Multilinguality by Pre-training Modular Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.06266/) (2022)
- [We Need to Talk About Random Splits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00636/) (2020)
- [LEXTREME: A Multi-Lingual and Multi-Task Benchmark for the Legal Domain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.13126/) (2023)
- [Swiss-Judgment-Prediction: A Multilingual Legal Judgment Prediction Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.00806/) (2021)
- [ChatGPT may Pass the Bar Exam soon, but has a Long Way to Go for the LexGLUE benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.12202/) (2023)
- [Predicting the Law Area and Decisions of French Supreme Court Cases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.01681/) (2017)
- [ClassActionPrediction: A Challenging Benchmark for Legal Judgment Prediction of Class Action Cases in the US](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.00582/) (2022)
- [An Empirical Study on Cross-X Transfer for Legal Judgment Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.12325/) (2022)
- [One Law, Many Languages: Benchmarking Multilingual Legal Reasoning for Judicial Support](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09237/) (2023)
- [SwissBERT: The Multilingual Language Model for Switzerland](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13310/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [LEXam: Benchmarking Legal Reasoning on 340 Law Exams](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.12864/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Many court systems are overwhelmed all over the world, leading to huge backlogs of pending cases. Effective triage systems, like those in emergency rooms, could ensure proper prioritization of open cases, optimizing time and resource allocation in the court system. In this work, we introduce the Criticality Prediction dataset, a novel resource for evaluating case prioritization. Our dataset features a two-tier labeling system: (1) the binary LD-Label, identifying cases published as Leading Decisions (LD), and (2) the more granular Citation-Label, ranking cases by their citation frequency and recency, allowing for a more nuanced evaluation. Unlike existing approaches that rely on resource-intensive manual annotations, we algorithmically derive labels leading to a much larger dataset than otherwise possible. We evaluate several multilingual models, including both smaller fine-tuned models and large language models in a zero-shot setting. Our results show that the fine-tuned models consistently outperform their larger counterparts, thanks to our large training set. Our results highlight that for highly domain-specific tasks like ours, large training sets are still valuable.