# Unlocking Legal Knowledge: A Multilingual Dataset for Judicial Summarization in Switzerland

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.13456 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13456/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 26 of its 56 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 26 of 26)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.13461/) (2019)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00027/) (2020)
- [mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11934/) (2020)
- [Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.08745/) (2018)
- [PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.08777/) (2019)
- [LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13076/) (2024)
- [Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00159/) (2024)
- [SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09525/) (2021)
- [DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11794/) (2024)
- [OLMoE: Open Mixture-of-Experts Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.02060/) (2024)
- [Newsroom: A Dataset of 1.3 Million Summaries with Diverse Extractive Strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.11283/) (2018)
- [AlignScore: Evaluating Factual Consistency with a Unified Alignment Function](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16739/) (2023)
- [Infini-gram: Scaling Unbounded n-gram Language Models to a Trillion Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.17377/) (2024)
- [BillSum: A Corpus for Automatic Summarization of US Legislation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.00523/) (2019)
- [Multi-LexSum: Real-World Summaries of Civil Rights Lawsuits at Multiple Granularities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.10883/) (2022)
- [EUR-Lex-Sum: A Multi- and Cross-lingual Dataset for Long-form Summarization in the Legal Domain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.13448/) (2022)
- [Incorporating Domain Knowledge for Extractive Summarization of Legal Case Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.15876/) (2021)
- [BudgetLongformer: Can we Cheaply Pretrain a SotA Legal Language Model From Scratch?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.17135/) (2022)
- [MILDSum: A Novel Benchmark Dataset for Multilingual Summarization of Indian Legal Case Judgments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18600/) (2023)
- [Legal Extractive Summarization of U.S. Court Opinions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08428/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [LEXam: Benchmarking Legal Reasoning on 340 Law Exams](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.12864/) (2025)
- [Modeling Motivated Reasoning in Law: Evaluating Strategic Role Conditioning in LLM Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.00529/) (2025)
- [Computational Law: Datasets, Benchmarks, and Ontologies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04305/) (2025)
- [CourtPressGER: A German Court Decision to Press Release Summarization Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.09434/) (2025)
- [Swiss-Bench SBP-002: A Frontier Model Comparison on Swiss Legal and Regulatory Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.23646/) (2026)
- [Challenges and Recommendations for LLM-as-a-Judge in Multilingual Settings and for Low-Resource Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.02235/) (2026)
- [SoK: Grading Open-Text Legal Answers, from Law School Exams to Trustworthy Rubric Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.19992/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Legal research depends on headnotes: concise summaries that help lawyers quickly identify relevant cases. Yet, many court decisions lack them due to the high cost of manual annotation. To address this gap, we introduce the Swiss Landmark Decisions Summarization (SLDS) dataset containing 20K rulings from the Swiss Federal Supreme Court, each with headnotes in German, French, and Italian. SLDS has the potential to significantly improve access to legal information and transform legal research in Switzerland. We fine-tune open models (Qwen2.5, Llama 3.2, Phi-3.5) and compare them to larger general-purpose and reasoning-tuned LLMs, including GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and the open-source DeepSeek R1. Using an LLM-as-a-Judge framework, we find that fine-tuned models perform well in terms of lexical similarity, while larger models generate more legally accurate and coherent summaries. Interestingly, reasoning-focused models show no consistent benefit, suggesting that factual precision is more important than deep reasoning in this task. We release SLDS under a CC BY 4.0 license to support future research in cross-lingual legal summarization.
