# How much does AI impact development speed? An enterprise-based randomized controlled trial

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12944 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12944/

## Key facts

- Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2024.

## Built on by (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Measuring the Impact of Early-2025 AI on Experienced Open-Source Developer Productivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.09089/) (2025)
- [CentaurEval: Benchmarking Human-in-the-Loop Value in Agentic Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.04111/) (2025)
- [RESCUE: Retrieval Augmented Secure Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.18204/) (2025)
- [Human oversight of agentic systems in practice: Examining the oversight work, challenges, and heuristics of developers using software agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.05391/) (2026)
- [Life After Benchmark Saturation: A Case Study of CORE-Bench](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.26158/) (2026)
- [The Productivity-Reliability Paradox: Specification-Driven Governance for AI-Augmented Software Development](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.01160/) (2026)
- [Follow the money: a startup-based measure of AI exposure across occupations, industries and regions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04924/) (2024)
- [Agentic Agile-V: From Vibe Coding to Verified Engineering in Software and Hardware Development](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.20456/) (2026)
- [Google's AI & Economy ATLAS v1.0: Mapping Gemini Usage in the Economy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.00038/) (2026)
- [Understanding and supporting how developers prompt for LLM-powered code editing in practice](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.20196/) (2025)
- [Adoption and Impact of Command-Line AI Coding Agents: A Study of Microsoft's Early 2026 Rollout of Claude Code and GitHub Copilot CLI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.01418/) (2026)
- [AI-Assisted Fixes to Code Review Comments at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.13499/) (2025)
- [Feedback Loops and Code Perturbations in LLM-based Software Engineering: A Case Study on a C-to-Rust Translation System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.02567/) (2025)
- [Multi-agent AI systems outperform human teams in creativity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.17885/) (2026)
- [HybridCodeAuthorship: A Benchmark Dataset for Line-Level Code Authorship Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.12620/) (2026)
- [Do These Violent Delights Have Violent Ends? Measuring the Post-Merge Fate of Agentic Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.09902/) (2026)
- [Characterizing the Quality Profile of AI-Generated C++ in Production](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.06640/) (2026)
- [SDAD: Spec-Driven Agentic Development for the AI-Native SDLC](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.20341/) (2026)
- [A Few Pages of Markdown: Committed AI Configuration and Lower Quality Cost after Coding-Agent Adoption](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.25241/) (2026)
- [Does AI Save Time on Product Design? A Randomized Controlled Experiment of AI Prompt-to-Design Workflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.26725/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

How much does AI assistance impact developer productivity? To date, the software engineering literature has provided a range of answers, targeting a diversity of outcomes: from perceived productivity to speed on task and developer throughput. Our randomized controlled trial with 96 full-time Google software engineers contributes to this literature by sharing an estimate of the impact of three AI features on the time developers spent on a complex, enterprise-grade task. We found that AI significantly shortened the time developers spent on task. Our best estimate of the size of this effect, controlling for factors known to influence developer time on task, stands at about 21%, although our confidence interval is large. We also found an interesting effect whereby developers who spend more hours on code-related activities per day were faster with AI. Product and future research considerations are discussed. In particular, we invite further research that explores the impact of AI at the ecosystem level and across multiple suites of AI-enhanced tools, since we cannot assume that the effect size obtained in our lab study will necessarily apply more broadly, or that the effect of AI found using internal Google tooling in the summer of 2024 will translate across tools and over time.