# Diversity of Thought Elicits Stronger Reasoning Capabilities in Multi-Agent Debate Frameworks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12853 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12853/

## Key facts

- Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 12 of its 18 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning for agents, planning and code](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-for-agents-planning-and-code/)
- LLM agents and tool use / [Social simulation and multi-agent debate](https://mlsanity.com/agents/social-simulation-and-multi-agent-debate/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16291/) (2023)
- [MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00352/) (2023)
- [Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14325/) (2023)
- [AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10848/) (2023)
- [A Diverse Corpus for Evaluating and Developing English Math Word Problem Solvers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.15772/) (2021)
- [ATHENA: Mathematical Reasoning with Thought Expansion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.01036/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Can LLM Agents Really Debate? A Controlled Study of Multi-Agent Debate in Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.07784/) (2025)
- [Learning to Reason via Mixture-of-Thought for Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15817/) (2025)
- [The PIMMUR Principles: Ensuring Validity in Collective Behavior of LLM Societies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18052/) (2025)
- [Co-Sight: Enhancing LLM-Based Agents via Conflict-Aware Meta-Verification and Trustworthy Reasoning with Structured Facts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.21557/) (2025)
- [AgentArk: Distilling Multi-Agent Intelligence into a Single LLM Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03955/) (2026)
- [CortexDebate: Debating Sparsely and Equally for Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.03928/) (2025)
- [APE: Agentic Prompt Enhancer for Image Generation and Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.00204/) (2026)
- [MAFA: A multi-agent framework for annotation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13668/) (2025)
- [Can Lessons From Human Teams Be Applied to Multi-Agent Systems? The Role of Structure, Diversity, and Interaction Dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.07488/) (2025)
- [Large Language Model-Based Automatic Formulation for Stochastic Optimization Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.17200/) (2025)
- [MAFA: A Multi-Agent Framework for Enterprise-Scale Annotation with Configurable Task Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.14184/) (2025)
- [PCRLLM: Proof-Carrying Reasoning with Large Language Models under Stepwise Logical Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.08392/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) excel in natural language generation but often confidently produce incorrect responses, especially in tasks like mathematical reasoning. Chain-of-thought prompting, self-verification, and multi-agent debate are among the strategies proposed to improve the reasoning and factual accuracy of LLMs. Building on Du et al.'s multi-agent debate framework, we find that multi-agent debate helps at any model scale, and that diversity of thought elicits stronger reasoning in debating LLMs. Across various model sizes, performance on mathematical reasoning tasks benefits most when diverse trained models are used. Remarkably, after 4 rounds of debate, a diverse set of medium-capacity models (Gemini-Pro, Mixtral 7BX8, and PaLM 2-M) outperforms GPT-4 on the GSM-8K benchmark, scoring 91% accuracy. By comparison, when 3 instances of Gemini-Pro are used, performance only reaches 82%. Finally, this diverse set of medium-capacity models sets a new state-of-the-art performance on the ASDiv benchmark (94%). These results underscore the idea that the future of AI is agentic, with diverse cooperating agents yielding emergent capabilities beyond even the most powerful individual models.