# Offline Model-Based Optimization by Learning to Rank

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.11502 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.11502/

## Key facts

- Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 48 of its 101 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 48)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.00667/) (2022)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [Conditional Generative Adversarial Nets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.1784/) (2014)
- [The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Tutorial](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.00772/) (2016)
- [Preference Ranking Optimization for Human Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17492/) (2023)
- [Interpolation Consistency Training for Semi-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.03825/) (2019)
- [Large Language Model Alignment: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15025/) (2023)
- [Decision-Focused Learning: Foundations, State of the Art, Benchmark and Future Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13565/) (2023)
- [Introducing LETOR 4.0 Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1306.2597/) (2013)
- [Conditioning by adaptive sampling for robust design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.10060/) (2019)
- [Accelerating Bayesian Optimization for Biological Sequence Design with Denoising Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.12742/) (2022)
- [Design-Bench: Benchmarks for Data-Driven Offline Model-Based Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.08450/) (2022)
- [LiPO: Listwise Preference Optimization through Learning-to-Rank](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01878/) (2024)
- [Conservative Objective Models for Effective Offline Model-Based Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.06882/) (2021)
- [Model Inversion Networks for Model-Based Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.13464/) (2019)
- [Diffusion Models for Black-Box Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07180/) (2023)
- [ROBEL: Robotics Benchmarks for Learning with Low-Cost Robots](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.11639/) (2019)
- [An Easy-to-use Real-world Multi-objective Optimization Problem Suite](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.12867/) (2020)
- [Decision-Focused Learning: Through the Lens of Learning to Rank](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03609/) (2021)
- [Autofocused oracles for model-based design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.08052/) (2020)
- [NeuralNDCG: Direct Optimisation of a Ranking Metric via Differentiable Relaxation of Sorting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.07831/) (2021)
- [RoMA: Robust Model Adaptation for Offline Model-based Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14188/) (2021)
- [Offline Model-Based Optimization via Normalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.07970/) (2021)
- [Self-Supervised Online Reward Shaping in Sparse-Reward Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.04529/) (2021)
- [Generative Pretraining for Black-Box Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.10786/) (2022)
- [Bidirectional Learning for Offline Infinite-width Model-based Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.07507/) (2022)
- [Data-Driven Offline Decision-Making via Invariant Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.11349/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Offline Model-Based Optimization: Comprehensive Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.17286/) (2025)
- [Surrogate Learning in Meta-Black-Box Optimization: A Preliminary Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18060/) (2025)
- [Towards Universal Offline Black-Box Optimization via Learning Language Model Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07109/) (2025)
- [ROOT: Rethinking Offline Optimization as Distributional Translation via Probabilistic Bridge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.16300/) (2025)
- [QAMRO: Quality-aware Adaptive Margin Ranking Optimization for Human-aligned Assessment of Audio Generation Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.08957/) (2025)
- [On the Learnability of Offline Model-Based Optimization: A Ranking Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.04000/) (2026)
- [Learning Design-Score Manifold to Guide Diffusion Models for Offline Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05680/) (2025)
- [Support-Proximity Augmented Diffusion Estimation for Offline Black-Box Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.11246/) (2026)
- [Sample Efficient Generative Molecular Optimization with Joint Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.10984/) (2026)
- [Black-Box Optimization From Small Offline Datasets via Meta Learning with Synthetic Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.12325/) (2026)
- [When May a Model Replace the Experiment? Audits, Licenses, and the Price of Trust in Surrogate-Driven Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.01378/) (2026)
- [PruneShift: A Framework for Evaluating Decision Reliability in Structured Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.29765/) (2026)
- [Rethinking Learnability in Offline Data-driven Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.01493/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Offline model-based optimization (MBO) aims to identify a design that maximizes a black-box function using only a fixed, pre-collected dataset of designs and their corresponding scores. A common approach in offline MBO is to train a regression-based surrogate model by minimizing mean squared error (MSE) and then find the best design within this surrogate model by different optimizers (e.g., gradient ascent). However, a critical challenge is the risk of out-of-distribution errors, i.e., the surrogate model may typically overestimate the scores and mislead the optimizers into suboptimal regions. Prior works have attempted to address this issue in various ways, such as using regularization techniques and ensemble learning to enhance the robustness of the model, but it still remains. In this paper, we argue that regression models trained with MSE are not well-aligned with the primary goal of offline MBO, which is to select promising designs rather than to predict their scores precisely. Notably, if a surrogate model can maintain the order of candidate designs based on their relative score relationships, it can produce the best designs even without precise predictions. To validate it, we conduct experiments to compare the relationship between the quality of the final designs and MSE, finding that the correlation is really very weak. In contrast, a metric that measures order-maintaining quality shows a significantly stronger correlation. Based on this observation, we propose learning a ranking-based model that leverages learning to rank techniques to prioritize promising designs based on their relative scores. We show that the generalization error on ranking loss can be well bounded. Empirical results across diverse tasks demonstrate the superior performance of our proposed ranking-based models than twenty existing methods.
