# Double Jeopardy and Climate Impact in the Use of Large Language Models: Socio-economic Disparities and Reduced Utility for Non-English Speakers

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10665 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10665/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.04672/) (2022)
- [LLMs instead of Human Judges? A Large Scale Empirical Study across 20 NLP Evaluation Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18403/) (2024)
- [Language Model Tokenizers Introduce Unfairness Between Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15425/) (2023)
- [Do All Languages Cost the Same? Tokenization in the Era of Commercial Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13707/) (2023)
- [Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16863/) (2023)
- [Multilingual Machine Translation with Large Language Models: Empirical Results and Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.04675/) (2023)
- [Towards Making the Most of ChatGPT for Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13780/) (2023)
- [Tokenizer Choice For LLM Training: Negligible or Crucial?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08754/) (2023)
- [REaLTabFormer: Generating Realistic Relational and Tabular Data using Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.02041/) (2023)
- [LLMCarbon: Modeling the end-to-end Carbon Footprint of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.14393/) (2023)
- [Making AI Less "Thirsty": Uncovering and Addressing the Secret Water Footprint of AI Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03271/) (2023)
- [Language Ranker: A Metric for Quantifying LLM Performance Across High and Low-Resource Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.11553/) (2024)
- [ChatGPT Needs SPADE (Sustainability, PrivAcy, Digital divide, and Ethics) Evaluation: A Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03123/) (2023)
- [Toward Sustainable GenAI using Generation Directives for Carbon-Friendly Large Language Model Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.12900/) (2024)
- [Prompting ChatGPT for Translation: A Comparative Analysis of Translation Brief and Persona Prompts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.00127/) (2024)
- [Optimizing Machine Translation through Prompt Engineering: An Investigation into ChatGPT's Customizability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01391/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [A Survey of Sustainability in Large Language Models: Applications, Economics, and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04782/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs), holds the potential to bridge language and information gaps, which can benefit the economies of developing nations. However, our analysis of FLORES-200, FLORES+, Ethnologue, and World Development Indicators data reveals that these benefits largely favor English speakers. Speakers of languages in low-income and lower-middle-income countries face higher costs when using OpenAI's GPT models via APIs because of how the system processes the input -- tokenization. Around 1.5 billion people, speaking languages primarily from lower-middle-income countries, could incur costs that are 4 to 6 times higher than those faced by English speakers. Disparities in LLM performance are significant, and tokenization in models priced per token amplifies inequalities in access, cost, and utility. Moreover, using the quality of translation tasks as a proxy measure, we show that LLMs perform poorly in low-resource languages, presenting a ``double jeopardy" of higher costs and poor performance for these users. We also discuss the direct impact of fragmentation in tokenizing low-resource languages on climate. This underscores the need for fairer algorithm development to benefit all linguistic groups.