# Evaluating of Machine Unlearning: Robustness Verification Without Prior Modifications

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10120 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10120/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 29 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Machine unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/safety/machine-unlearning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 29 of 29)

- [Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04730/) (2017)
- [Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.03817/) (2019)
- [Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.04933/) (2019)
- [Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03030/) (2019)
- [Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.05890/) (2019)
- [Amnesiac Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.10981/) (2020)
- [Towards Unbounded Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.09880/) (2023)
- [Fast Yet Effective Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.08947/) (2021)
- [Model Sparsity Can Simplify Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.04934/) (2023)
- [Fast Machine Unlearning Without Retraining Through Selective Synaptic Dampening](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07707/) (2023)
- [Forgetting Outside the Box: Scrubbing Deep Networks of Information Accessible from Input-Output Observations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.02960/) (2020)
- [Directional convergence and alignment in deep learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.06657/) (2020)
- [On the Necessity of Auditable Algorithmic Definitions for Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.11891/) (2021)
- [Mixed-Privacy Forgetting in Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.13431/) (2020)
- [Graph Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14991/) (2021)
- [Boundary Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11570/) (2023)
- [Zero-Shot Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.05629/) (2022)
- [Reconstructing Training Data from Trained Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07758/) (2022)
- [Machine Unlearning for Random Forests](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.05567/) (2020)
- [The Right to be Forgotten in Federated Learning: An Efficient Realization with Rapid Retraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.07320/) (2022)
- [Federated Unlearning via Class-Discriminative Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.11794/) (2021)
- [ML-Doctor: Holistic Risk Assessment of Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.02551/) (2021)
- [Fast Model Debias with Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12560/) (2023)
- [Black-box Dataset Ownership Verification via Backdoor Watermarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.06015/) (2022)
- [Deconstructing Data Reconstruction: Multiclass, Weight Decay and General Losses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01827/) (2023)
- [Machine Unlearning via Null Space Calibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13588/) (2024)
- [Reinforcement Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.15910/) (2023)
- [Proof of Unlearning: Definitions and Instantiation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11334/) (2022)
- [Update Selective Parameters: Federated Machine Unlearning Based on Model Explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12516/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Towards Reliable Forgetting: A Survey on Machine Unlearning Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.15115/) (2025)
- [Forgetting Similar Samples: Can Machine Unlearning Do it Better?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.06938/) (2026)
- [Damnatio Memoriae: Adversarially and Selectively Forgetting Identities in the Embedding Space of Face Recognition Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.27115/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Machine unlearning, a process enabling pre-trained models to remove the influence of specific training samples, has attracted significant attention in recent years. While extensive research has focused on developing efficient unlearning strategies, the critical aspect of unlearning verification has been largely overlooked. Existing verification methods mainly rely on machine learning attack techniques, such as membership inference attacks (MIAs) or backdoor attacks. However, these methods, not being formally designed for verification purposes, exhibit limitations in robustness and only support a small, predefined subset of samples. Moreover, dependence on prepared sample-level modifications of MIAs or backdoor attacks restricts their applicability in Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) environments. To address these limitations, we propose a novel robustness verification scheme without any prior modifications, and can support verification on a much larger set. Our scheme employs an optimization-based method to recover the actual training samples from the model. By comparative analysis of recovered samples extracted pre- and post-unlearning, MLaaS users can verify the unlearning process. This verification scheme, operating exclusively through model parameters, avoids the need for any sample-level modifications prior to model training while supporting verification on a much larger set and maintaining robustness. The effectiveness of our proposed approach is demonstrated through theoretical analysis and experiments involving diverse models on various datasets in different scenarios.