# Cross-Domain Evaluation of Few-Shot Classification Models: Natural Images vs. Histopathological Images

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.09176 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.09176/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.05175/) (2017)
- [Matching Networks for One Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.04080/) (2016)
- [SimpleShot: Revisiting Nearest-Neighbor Classification for Few-Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.04623/) (2019)
- [Self-Supervision with Superpixels: Training Few-shot Medical Image Segmentation without Annotation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.09886/) (2020)
- [Laplacian Regularized Few-Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.15486/) (2020)
- [Joint Distribution Matters: Deep Brownian Distance Covariance for Few-Shot Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.04567/) (2022)
- [Momentum Contrastive Learning for Few-Shot COVID-19 Diagnosis from Chest CT Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.13276/) (2020)
- [FHIST: A Benchmark for Few-shot Classification of Histological Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.00092/) (2022)
- [A Location-Sensitive Local Prototype Network for Few-Shot Medical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.10178/) (2021)
- [Towards better understanding and better generalization of few-shot classification in histology images with contrastive learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.09059/) (2022)
- [Few-Shot Histopathology Image Classification: Evaluating State-of-the-Art Methods and Unveiling Performance Insights](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.13816/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Few-Shot Learning Pipeline for Monkeypox Skin Disease Classification Using CNN Feature Extractors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.05034/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this study, we investigate the performance of few-shot classification models across different domains, specifically natural images and histopathological images. We first train several few-shot classification models on natural images and evaluate their performance on histopathological images. Subsequently, we train the same models on histopathological images and compare their performance. We incorporated four histopathology datasets and one natural images dataset and assessed performance across 5-way 1-shot, 5-way 5-shot, and 5-way 10-shot scenarios using a selection of state-of-the-art classification techniques. Our experimental results reveal insights into the transferability and generalization capabilities of few-shot classification models between diverse image domains. We analyze the strengths and limitations of these models in adapting to new domains and provide recommendations for optimizing their performance in cross-domain scenarios. This research contributes to advancing our understanding of few-shot learning in the context of image classification across diverse domains.
