# Extended convexity and smoothness and their applications in deep learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.05807 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05807/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 37 of its 61 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 37)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07572/) (2018)
- [Convex optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01946/) (2021)
- [Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.03530/) (2016)
- [On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minima](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.04836/) (2016)
- [Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.04838/) (2016)
- [Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-off](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.11118/) (2018)
- [A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-Parameterization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.03962/) (2018)
- [Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1309.5549/) (2013)
- [Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.02054/) (2018)
- [Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00165/) (2017)
- [Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.03804/) (2018)
- [Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.08584/) (2019)
- [A Mean Field View of the Landscape of Two-Layers Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.06561/) (2018)
- [On the Global Convergence of Gradient Descent for Over-parameterized Models using Optimal Transport](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.09545/) (2018)
- [Why gradient clipping accelerates training: A theoretical justification for adaptivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11881/) (2019)
- [Learning and Generalization in Overparameterized Neural Networks, Going Beyond Two Layers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.04918/) (2018)
- [Lower Bounds for Non-Convex Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.02365/) (2019)
- [Momentum-Based Variance Reduction in Non-Convex SGD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10018/) (2019)
- [Identifying and attacking the saddle point problem in high-dimensional non-convex optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1406.2572/) (2014)
- [SPIDER: Near-Optimal Non-Convex Optimization via Stochastic Path Integrated Differential Estimator](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.01695/) (2018)
- [Learning Overparameterized Neural Networks via Stochastic Gradient Descent on Structured Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.01204/) (2018)
- [SARAH: A Novel Method for Machine Learning Problems Using Stochastic Recursive Gradient](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.00102/) (2017)
- [Stochastic Gradient Descent Optimizes Over-parameterized Deep ReLU Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.08888/) (2018)
- [Lower Bounds for Finding Stationary Points I](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.11606/) (2017)
- [Stochastic gradient descent performs variational inference, converges to limit cycles for deep networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.11029/) (2017)
- [Mean Field Analysis of Neural Networks: A Central Limit Theorem](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.09372/) (2018)
- [Improved Analysis of Clipping Algorithms for Non-convex Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02519/) (2020)
- [Robustness to Unbounded Smoothness of Generalized SignSGD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.11195/) (2022)
- [CARS: Continuous Evolution for Efficient Neural Architecture Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.04977/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Classical assumptions like strong convexity and Lipschitz smoothness often fail to capture the nature of deep learning optimization problems, which are typically non-convex and non-smooth, making traditional analyses less applicable. This study aims to elucidate the mechanisms of non-convex optimization in deep learning by extending the conventional notions of strong convexity and Lipschitz smoothness. By leveraging these concepts, we prove that, under the established constraints, the empirical risk minimization problem is equivalent to optimizing the local gradient norm and structural error, which together constitute the upper and lower bounds of the empirical risk. Furthermore, our analysis demonstrates that the stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithm can effectively minimize the local gradient norm. Additionally, techniques like skip connections, over-parameterization, and random parameter initialization are shown to help control the structural error. Ultimately, we validate the core conclusions of this paper through extensive experiments. Theoretical analysis and experimental results indicate that our findings provide new insights into the mechanisms of non-convex optimization in deep learning.
