# Developing Assurance Cases for Adversarial Robustness and Regulatory Compliance in LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.05304 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05304/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 14 of its 20 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Jailbreaking](https://mlsanity.com/safety/jailbreaking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15043/) (2023)
- [How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06373/) (2024)
- [Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandbox](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15817/) (2023)
- [Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07263/) (2017)
- [Language Models are Multilingual Chain-of-Thought Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03057/) (2022)
- [SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03684/) (2023)
- [Detecting Language Model Attacks with Perplexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.14132/) (2023)
- [Great, Now Write an Article About That: The Crescendo Multi-Turn LLM Jailbreak Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01833/) (2024)
- [LLM Self Defense: By Self Examination, LLMs Know They Are Being Tricked](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07308/) (2023)
- [Coercing LLMs to do and reveal (almost) anything](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14020/) (2024)
- [Self-Guard: Empower the LLM to Safeguard Itself](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15851/) (2023)
- [Guidance on the Assurance of Machine Learning in Autonomous Systems (AMLAS)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.01564/) (2021)
- [Generative AI in EU Law: Liability, Privacy, Intellectual Property, and Cybersecurity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.07348/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [OntoGSN: An Ontology-Based Framework for Semantic Management and Extension of Assurance Cases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.11023/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents an approach to developing assurance cases for adversarial robustness and regulatory compliance in large language models (LLMs). Focusing on both natural and code language tasks, we explore the vulnerabilities these models face, including adversarial attacks based on jailbreaking, heuristics, and randomization. We propose a layered framework incorporating guardrails at various stages of LLM deployment, aimed at mitigating these attacks and ensuring compliance with the EU AI Act. Our approach includes a meta-layer for dynamic risk management and reasoning, crucial for addressing the evolving nature of LLM vulnerabilities. We illustrate our method with two exemplary assurance cases, highlighting how different contexts demand tailored strategies to ensure robust and compliant AI systems.